Errors in Reporting of Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Imaging in Medicine · Ethics in Clinical Research · Animal testing and alternatives
In the Original Investigation titled “Beating Heart Transplant Procedures Using Organs From Donors With Circulatory Death,”^1^ published March 11, 2024, the authors had incorrectly reported that the Stanford University institutional review board had approved this study and the participants had provided informed consent. The correct statements are: “This case series was deemed exempt from approval by the Stanford University institutional review board. The exemption for data use for this secondary analysis did not require informed consent.” This article has been corrected.^1^
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.