# Glucosinolate variation, heterosis, and prediction of hybrid performance from parental values in white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)

**Authors:** Primož Fabjan, Maja Mikulič-Petkovšek, Damijana Kastelec, Adriana Podržaj, Katarina Rudolf-Pilih

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1703515 · Frontiers in Plant Science · 2026-02-20

## TL;DR

This study explores how glucosinolate levels vary in cabbage hybrids and how parental plants can predict hybrid performance, aiding in breeding for better nutritional and defense traits.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that parental glucosinolate profiling can predict hybrid performance in cabbage, reducing the need for extensive field trials.

## Key findings

- Total glucosinolate concentrations varied significantly among cabbage genotypes, with aliphatic GSLs dominating.
- Mid-parent heterosis varied by compound, with some glucosinolates showing consistently positive or negative heterosis.
- Parental glucosinolate levels effectively predicted hybrid performance for major aliphatic glucosinolates.

## Abstract

Glucosinolates (GSLs) are sulfur-containing secondary metabolites with important roles in plant defense and human health. Developing hybrids with increased GSL content is a promising approach to improve both resistance and health-related traits in cabbage. In other crops, moderately to highly heritable traits often show strong parent–hybrid correlations, enabling prediction of hybrid performance from parental phenotypes. Because GSLs show moderate to high heritability in closely related Brassica crops, this strategy has strong potential for developing cabbage hybrids with increased GSL content. Here, we evaluated GSL composition, variation, heterosis, and parent–hybrid correlations in 14 cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) doubled haploid lines, 11 derived hybrids, and two commercial hybrids. Desulfoglucosinolates were quantified by UHPLC–MS/MS using glucotropaeolin as an internal standard. Thirteen GSLs were detected across all genotypes, and total GSL concentrations ranged from 19.7 to 67.8 μmol g⁻¹ dw, indicating substantial genotype-dependent variation, with aliphatic GSLs dominating the profile (73.0%), followed by indolyl (26.9%) and aromatic (0.1%). Hierarchical clustering revealed two major genotype groups, differentiated primarily by 3C and 4C aliphatic GSLs, with correlation analysis reflecting coordinated regulation and trade-offs in their accumulation. Mid-parent heterosis (MPH) varied by compound and parental combination, with some GSLs showing consistently positive MPH (e.g., gluconapin) and others consistently negative MPH (e.g., neoglucobrassicin). Linear regression models showed that mid-parent values explained a high proportion of hybrid variability for major aliphatic glucosinolates and, to a lesser extent, for indolyl glucobrassicin, supporting the use of parental phenotyping to predict hybrid GSL performance. In parallel, agronomic traits showed uniformly positive mid-parent heterosis, with head weight exhibiting the highest values. Overall, these results support integrating parental GSL profiling into cabbage breeding to improve nutritional and defense-related traits alongside yield, thereby reducing the need for extensive testcrossing and field trials.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** glucotropaeolin (PubChem CID 9548605), gluconapin (PubChem CID 9548620), neoglucobrassicin (PubChem CID 656565)
- **Species:** Brassica oleracea var. capitata (taxon 3716)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** MYB [NCBI Gene 106327854], MYB28 [NCBI Gene 106313100], MYB2 [NCBI Gene 106299239], MYB3 [NCBI Gene 106299923]
- **Diseases:** MM-P (MESH:D002972), toxicity (MESH:D064420), bacterial infection (MESH:D001424), MPH (MESH:D063129), bitter (MESH:D013651), inflammatory (MESH:D007249), GBS (MESH:D020275), white (MESH:D000090122), black rot infected (MESH:D005535), GSL (MESH:C536411)
- **Chemicals:** GTP (MESH:C060321), sulfur (MESH:D013455), IBA (MESH:C014612), (Z)-cis-N-hydroximinosulfate ester (-), nitriles (MESH:D009570), amino acids (MESH:D000596), BAP (MESH:C480551), methyl jasmonate (MESH:C072239), progoitrin (MESH:C009048), phenylalanine (MESH:D010649), polyphenol (MESH:D059808), sucrose (MESH:D013395), MgO (MESH:D008277), H (MESH:D006859), tryptophan (MESH:D014364), sodium acetate (MESH:D019346), neoglucobrassicin (MESH:C555404), mustard oil (MESH:C027793), dichloroisocyanuric acid (MESH:C011765), jasmonic acid (MESH:C011006), DEAE-Sephadex A-25 (MESH:C030237), PRO (MESH:D011392), methanol (MESH:D000432), TE (MESH:D013691), methionine (MESH:D008715), salicylic acid (MESH:D020156), thiocyanates (MESH:D013861), Formic acid (MESH:C030544), nitrogen (MESH:D009584), cellulose acetate (MESH:C005062), L-1 (MESH:D000077543), ethylene (MESH:C036216), gluconapin (MESH:C552436), -carbon (MESH:D002244), agar (MESH:D000362), Sulforaphane (MESH:C016766), Acetonitrile (MESH:C032159), tyrosine (MESH:D014443), water (MESH:D014867), gluconasturtiin (MESH:C443697), GSL (MESH:D005961), ITCs (MESH:D017879)
- **Species:** Brassica napus (oilseed rape, species) [taxon 3708], Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress, species) [taxon 3702], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (cauliflower, varietas) [taxon 3715], Brassica (genus) [taxon 3705], Brassica juncea (brown mustard, species) [taxon 3707], Brassica carinata (Abyssinian mustard, species) [taxon 52824], Plenodomus lingam (blackleg of canola fungus, species) [taxon 5022], Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage, species) [taxon 3712], Neopseudocercosporella brassicae (species) [taxon 1873267], Plutella xylostella (cabbage moth, species) [taxon 51655], Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (species) [taxon 5180]
- **Cell lines:** PC3 — Homo sapiens (Human), Prostate carcinoma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0035), capitata — Ceratitis capitata (Mediterranean fruit fly), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_Z884)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963295/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963295/full.md

## References

62 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963295/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963295