# Effect of adhesive strategy on the shear bond strength of monochromatic and nanohybrid composite resins to glass ionomer cements in the sandwich technique

**Authors:** Rizwan Jouhar

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fdmed.2026.1728691 · Frontiers in Dental Medicine · 2026-02-20

## TL;DR

This study examines how different adhesives affect the bond strength of composite resins to glass ionomer cements in a dental sandwich technique.

## Contribution

The study identifies optimal adhesive strategies for maximizing bond strength in a bilayered dental restoration technique.

## Key findings

- RMGIC showed higher bond strength than self-cure GIC.
- Nanohybrid resins had higher bond strength than monochromatic resins.
- Etch-and-rinse adhesives improved bonding to RMGIC but not to self-cure GIC.

## Abstract

The bilayered (sandwich) technique combines the biological benefits of glass ionomer cements (GICs) with the esthetics and mechanical strength of composite resins. Interfacial bonding in this technique is influenced by GIC type, composite resin, and adhesive strategy. This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of monochromatic and nanohybrid composite resins bonded to resin-modified (RMGIC) and self-cure GIC using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive protocols.

Eighty standardized GIC specimens (4 × 3 mm) fabricated from RMGIC and self-cure GIC were randomly assigned to eight groups (n = 10). Monochromatic (Vitra Unique) and nanohybrid (Filtek Z250 XT) composite resins were bonded using either an etch-and-rinse (Adper Single Bond 2) or self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond) adhesive. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were analyzed. Data were evaluated using three-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p < 0.05).

RMGIC demonstrated significantly higher SBS than self-cure GIC (p = 0.006), and the nanohybrid composite resin exhibited higher SBS values than the monochromatic composite resin (p = 0.005). A significant interaction between GIC type and adhesive strategy was observed (p = 0.033), whereby the etch-and-rinse adhesive enhanced bonding to RMGIC but did not significantly improve bonding to self-cure glass ionomer cement. The highest SBS values were observed when RMGIC was bonded using an etch-and-rinse adhesive and restored with a nanohybrid composite resin, whereas the lowest SBS values occurred when self-cure glass ionomer cement was bonded using a self-etch adhesive and restored with a monochromatic composite resin.

RMGIC combined with an etch-and-rinse adhesive, particularly when restored with a nanohybrid composite, provided superior immediate bond strength compared with self-cure GIC. These results reflect short-term in vitro performance and do not represent long-term clinical durability.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** GICs (MESH:C567350), caries (MESH:D003731)
- **Chemicals:** water (MESH:D014867), fluoride (MESH:D005459), phosphates (MESH:D010710), Clearfil SE Bond (MESH:C438313), glass ionomer (MESH:C015897), calcium silicate (MESH:C031293), Biodentine (MESH:C506393), methacrylate (MESH:D008689), ESPE (-), Filtek Z250 (MESH:C444701), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (MESH:C005044), phosphoric acid (MESH:C030242), oil (MESH:D009821)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963230/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963230/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963230/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12963230