# Unstable aid, unstable lives: a call for reinforced global health solidarity

## TL;DR

Global health aid cuts are causing major disruptions, and the paper calls for stronger international cooperation to build a more resilient health system.

## Contribution

The paper introduces an Aid Volatility/Shocks Framework and a multi-lateral 'anti-shock resilience' model to address funding instability in global health.

## Key findings

- USAID funding freeze disrupted health programs in over 130 countries, especially in fragile systems.
- Reduced donor contributions are weakening global health institutions like WHO and the Global Fund.
- Aid volatility threatens to reverse two decades of progress in maternal and HIV health outcomes.

## Abstract

Recent reductions in global health aid, notably the 2025 freeze of USAID funding, have severely disrupted essential health programs in over 130 countries. This disruption has hit essential health interventions such as HIV/AIDS treatment, maternal health, and nutritional support the hardest. Shift in donor engagement along with the sudden USAID freeze brought systemic vulnerabilities in health systems highly reliant on external assistance, particularly across countries with fragile infrastructures. Reduced contributions from major donors, including the United States and United Kingdom, alongside declining multilateral funding, have critically weakened institutions like WHO, UNICEF, Gavi, and the Global Fund. Current projections indicate significant increases in preventable maternal deaths, unintended pregnancies, and HIV infections, threatening to reverse the global health progress of two decades. This perspective analyzes the implications of shifting donor strategies and underscores the urgency of reinforcing multilateral cooperation through Aid Volatility/Shocks Framework to mitigate the cascading effects of acute funding shocks on global health security and preventable mortality. Drawing on recent successes such as COVAX’s global vaccine distribution and the effectiveness of multilateral partnerships during health emergencies, we propose a forward-looking framework: a multi-lateral “anti-shock resilience” model that includes predictable financing, coordinated emergency response, and strengthened governance mechanisms. To achieve these objectives, it requires immediate donor re-engagement, institutional strengthening, and flexible funding models. Ultimately, the ongoing aid crisis highlights the need to prioritize a transition from dependency-driven approaches towards a global health architecture that is sustainable, equitable, and resilient.