# Receiving preferred treatments may improve low back pain outcomes: a non-randomized comparative study

**Authors:** Tareq I. Alshyab, Ahmad Alrawashdeh, Nizar Mohammad Audat, Khader A. Almhdawi, Alaa Oteir, Zaid Aldahamsheh, Mohammad A. Bani Hani, Saddam F. Kanaan

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2026.1687883 · Frontiers in Pain Research · 2026-02-20

## TL;DR

People with low back pain who received their preferred treatments showed better pain and mental health outcomes compared to those who did not.

## Contribution

This study demonstrates that aligning treatment with patient preferences can improve outcomes in low back pain management.

## Key findings

- Preferred treatment group had significantly lower pain ratings compared to non-preferred group.
- Participants receiving preferred treatments showed reduced disability and stress levels.
- Preferred treatment was associated with better psychological outcomes like anxiety and depression.

## Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare health-related outcomes between individuals with low back pain (LBP) who received their preferred treatments and those who received non-preferred treatments.

A non-randomized, multicenter, comparative study was conducted. Patients with chronic LBP (duration >3 months) were recruited from military hospitals in Jordan. The LBP Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire (TBQ) was used to determine participants’ treatment preferences across five treatment options. Baseline assessments of all outcome measures were compared with post-treatment assessments using multivariate and univariate analyses of variance.

A total of 205 participants completed the study with a mean age of 42.6 (±12.9). According to TBQ, 131 participants (63.9%) received their preferred treatment. Compared with the non-preferred group, the preferred group demonstrated a statistically significant (p < 0.001) decrease in numeric pain rating scores (adjusted mean difference = −0.87), Oswestry Disability Index scores (adjusted mean difference = −4.64), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)-stress (adjusted mean difference = −1.91), DASS-anxiety (adjusted mean difference = −2.11), and DASS-depression (adjusted mean difference = −1.94).

Incorporating patients' treatment preferences into treatment plans may positively influence pain, functional outcomes, and psychological wellbeing.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** knee osteoarthritis (MESH:D020370), ODI (MESH:C566784), inflammatory arthritis (MESH:D001168), mental (MESH:D008607), cognitive or communication deficits (MESH:D003147), disability (MESH:D009069), Depression (MESH:D003866), musculoskeletal disorder (MESH:D009140), diabetes (MESH:D003920), Fear (MESH:C000719212), cancer (MESH:D009369), mental disorders (MESH:D001523), asthma (MESH:D001249), Anxiety Stress (MESH:D001007), Pain (MESH:D010146), LBP (MESH:D017116), neurological diseases (MESH:D020271), chronic musculoskeletal pain (MESH:D059352), ankylosing spondylitis (MESH:D013167), functional disability (MESH:D003291)
- **Chemicals:** TBQ (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12962917/full.md

## References

46 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12962917/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12962917