Introducing the Concept of Small Vulnerable Newborns (SVN) as an Additional Endpoint to Evaluate Birth Outcomes in the Context of RSV Immunization Studies—A Commentary
Jacob Gerstenberg, Carlotta Helbig, Benjamin T. Schleenvoigt

TL;DR
This commentary suggests using the concept of 'small vulnerable newborns' to better assess birth outcomes in RSV vaccination studies.
Contribution
The paper introduces the 'small vulnerable newborns' concept as a new endpoint for evaluating maternal RSV vaccination outcomes.
Findings
Differences in preterm birth rates between RSV vaccine studies appear inconsistent.
The 'small vulnerable newborns' concept could provide a more nuanced evaluation of birth outcomes.
This approach may improve understanding of maternal RSV vaccination effects.
Abstract
Infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) represents a substantial burden of disease, especially in children. While one vaccine (RSVpreF) has been recommended for administration in pregnant women, another one (RSVPreF3‐Mat) has been discontinued in a Phase 3 study due to an increased incidence of preterm births in the study group. When comparing the studies related to these two vaccine candidates, the differences in preterm birth rates appear inconsistent. For a more differentiated evaluation of birth outcomes associated with maternal RSV vaccination, we recommend introducing the previously described concept of “small and vulnerable newborns.”
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRespiratory viral infections research · COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction · Virology and Viral Diseases
