# Bridging Functions and Values: Advancing Wetland Ecosystem Service Assessment Through Use of a Service Capacity Index

**Authors:** William J. Kleindl, Sarah P. Church, Kai C. Rains, Mark C. Rains, Eric D. Stein, Morgan K. Suddreth

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s13157-025-02028-1 · Wetlands (Wilmington, N.c.) · 2026-03-04

## TL;DR

The paper introduces a new method to assess wetland ecosystem services using a Service Capacity Index to better support regulatory and monitoring programs.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is the development of a Service Capacity Index that complements existing functional capacity indices for wetland assessment.

## Key findings

- A conceptual framework for a rapid wetland ecosystem service assessment tool was developed.
- The Service Capacity Index incorporates beneficiary access to ecological products from wetlands.
- The approach was illustrated using Montana floodplain wetlands as a case study.

## Abstract

Wetland service or values are often assumed to occur at a comparable level to wetland function (i.e., higher functioning wetlands provide more services). However, services are seldom directly evaluated because of the lack of structured assessment approaches. For wetland ecosystem service to be effectively incorporated in regulatory and monitoring programs, there needs to be parsimonious assessment tools that can be applied systematically, repeatably, and rapidly. This approach begins by disentangling existing terminology and clearly defining all the terms necessary to support the assessment of ecosystem services (ES). We provide context to illustrate how these terms have been variously employed in wetland science and policy, and follow with a conceptual framework for a rapid wetland ES assessment tool that is implemented as a module to existing rapid wetland function or condition assessment tools. We employ a service capacity index (SCI) that builds on existing concepts of functional capacity indices (FCIs) by incorporating the opportunity for beneficiaries to avail themselves of the source and sink ecological products provided by wetlands. We argue that if the goal of assessment is to meet compensatory mitigation requirements of unavoidable loss of wetland service, an SCI is an appropriate complement to an FCI. We illustrate the application of the proposed approach using Montana floodplain wetlands as an example.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** SCI (MESH:C566784), confusion (MESH:D003221), flood (MESH:C565009), Wetland Condition (MESH:D020763), water resource impairments (MESH:D000069578)
- **Chemicals:** CWA (-), Water (MESH:D014867), dissolved organic carbon (MESH:D000090422), carbon (MESH:D002244)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12960418/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12960418/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12960418/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12960418