# A longitudinal comparison of symptom-distress and person-centeredness between a fast-track programme for cardiac surgery and conventional care

## TL;DR

This study compares recovery experiences between a fast-track cardiac surgery program and conventional care, finding similar symptom distress and patient-centered care but shorter ICU stays with the fast-track approach.

## Contribution

The study provides longitudinal evidence on symptom distress and person-centered care in fast-track versus conventional cardiac surgery recovery.

## Key findings

- The fast-track group had less physical restriction in ICU but similar symptom distress in the surgical ward.
- The fast-track group reported lower pain ratings at all time points compared to conventional care.
- Perceived person-centered care was equivalent between the two groups at both time points.

## Abstract

Impaired recovery in the post-operative phase after cardiac surgery predicts long-term recovery, making it important to identify and treat symptoms immediately. A fast-track programme after cardiac surgery was implemented. When developing such programmes, the patients’ perspective of perioperative care is of major importance. This is a non-randomized longitudinal observational study in which symptom distress, perceived person-centeredness and pain level were prospectively compared after cardiac surgery. The aim of this non-randomized longitudinal observational study is to prospectively compare symptom-distress, perceived person-centeredness and pain level after cardiac surgery between a fast-track group and those undergoing conventional postoperative care.

Symptom distress was explored and compared between a fast-track group and those undergoing conventional postoperative care. A total of 149 participants, 75% men and 25% women, with a mean age of 67 years (SD 9.9 years), were included. The control group comprised 117 patients and the fast-track group 31. Symptom distress was assessed by the Post-Operative Recovery Profile Instrument, person-centeredness by the Being Taken Seriously Questionnaire, while a Numerical Rating Scale was employed to measure self-rated pain.

Regarding symptom distress, the control group felt significantly (p = .041) more restricted in physical activity in the thoracic intensive care unit (TICU) compared to the fast-track group. However, no differences in symptom distress between the groups were reported in the surgical ward. Longitudinally, an increase in symptom distress was found in the TICU, followed by improvements at the surgical ward. The fast-track group demonstrated lower pain ratings at all time points compared to the control group. The pain intensity score was relatively high during the first six hours after extubation. There was no difference between the control group and the fast-track group regarding their experiences of receiving person-centred care at either of the two time points.

A fast-track programme is equivalent to conventional care in terms of perceived symptom-distress and person-centeredness and also reduces the duration of ICU care.

Detailed information regarding symptom distress could be used as an evidence-based foundation for symptom management support. The results contribute to an understanding of expected symptom patterns during cardiac surgery, which might increase self-efficacy when used to inform and educate patients perioperatively.