# Association between the incidence of infusion-related reactions by obinutuzumab and the dose of corticosteroid as premedication: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

**Authors:** Tatsuya Ohtsubo, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Saori Matumoto, Kaori Ito, Yuzuka Sasa, Kosuke Tomishima, Satoshi Dote, Katuya Makihara, Yoshinori Wakasugi, Tsutomu Mitsuie, Kouhei Yamagiwa, Kazuo Sato, Hiroki Hasegawa, Nobuhiko Uoshima, Yumi Kitahiro, Kanji Tomogane

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s40780-026-00546-6 · Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences · 2026-02-03

## TL;DR

This study found that higher corticosteroid doses and specific drug choices may reduce infusion-related reactions during obinutuzumab treatment.

## Contribution

The study identifies associations between corticosteroid type and IRR incidence, offering guidance on premedication choices.

## Key findings

- High-dose corticosteroids were linked to lower IRR incidence compared to low-dose.
- Dexamethasone was associated with lower IRR risk than hydrocortisone or methylprednisolone.
- Second-generation H1-receptor antagonists were better at preventing IRR than first-generation ones.

## Abstract

Premedication with corticosteroids is recommended for prophylaxis against infusion-related reactions (IRRs) caused by obinutuzumab despite a lack of solid evidence regarding the dose of corticosteroids.

The incidence rates of IRR in the high-dose and low-dose corticosteroid groups were investigated and compared using Student’s t-test.Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on patients to explore the risk of developing IRRs with obinutuzumab.

The incidence of IRRs in the high-dose and low-dose corticosteroid groups at the initial administration of obinutuzumab was 27.0% (41/152) and 48.4% (31/64), respectively, indicating that the high-dose group had a lower incidence of IRRs (p = 0.002). The incidence of IRRs at the initial administration of obinutuzumab was significantly associated with the administration of first-generation histamine 1 receptor antagonist (OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.16–9.47; reference: second-generation histamine 1 receptor antagonist), hydrocortisone (OR = 7.21, 95% CI: 1.57–33.15; reference: dexamethasone), and methylprednisolone (OR = 3.99, 95% CI :1.13–14.10; reference: dexamethasone), although no association was found with the lower dose of corticosteroids.

Although no association was found between corticosteroid dosage and IRR when considering multiple factors, dexamethasone may be a better option than hydrocortisone or methylprednisolone for preventing IRR. Additionally, second-generation H1-receptor antagonists may be a better option than first-generation drugs. Certain combinations of premedications may influence infusion reaction incidence.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40780-026-00546-6.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** hydrocortisone (PubChem CID 5754), dexamethasone (PubChem CID 5743), methylprednisolone (PubChem CID 6741)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** obinutuzumab (MESH:C543332)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958665/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958665/full.md

## References

7 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958665/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958665