# Implementation of the Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology in Ukraine: Prediction Model Development

## TL;DR

This study identifies factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based psychology practices among Ukrainian psychologists, especially in the context of the 2022 Russian invasion.

## Contribution

The paper develops and tests prediction models for evidence-based practice implementation in Ukraine, a novel approach in this region.

## Key findings

- Psychologists who use proven interventions and belong to associations are more likely to believe they implement evidence-based practice.
- Experience in therapy and supervision, along with positive attitudes, predicts more intensive use of evidence-based practice elements.
- Belief in implementing evidence-based practice only moderately correlates with the intensity of its use.

## Abstract

Objective: By 2021, researchers reported limited access to evidence-based mental health interventions in Ukraine, which became more crucial after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) requires professionals to consider equal contributions of the best available research, practical experience, and the context of the unique client. This study aimed to reveal the possible predictors of EBPP implementation among Ukrainian psychologists (n = 366) by developing and testing multivariable prediction models. Methods: The research design followed the methodology of “Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis” — TRIPOD checklist. The online survey included a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, educational and professional background, and a purposely developed part regarding the knowledge, attitudes, and utilization of the EBPP approach. Results: Regression analysis revealed different prediction models for the belief that the respondent implements EBPP and the intensity of EBPP elements implementation, explaining 24.4% and 18.5% of their variance with 3 and 5 predictors, respectively. Conclusion: Psychologists believed they were implementing EBPP when they used interventions/methods with proven efficacy, were members of psychological associations, and assessed their knowledge regarding EBPP higher. However, more intensive use of EBPP elements was predicted by a psychologist’s experience in personal therapy and supervision, a positive attitude toward EBPP elements, membership in a psychological association, and a perceived level of knowledge regarding EBPP. The belief that the psychologist’s practice aligns with the EBPP requirements and the intensity of using EBPP elements had a rather moderate correlation.