The Association Between Plant-Based Diet and Gallstone Disease: A Case-Control Study
Mohammad Hossein Ebrahimizadeh, Ava Kheirizadeh, Azita Hekmatdoost, Moloud Ghorbani, Amir Sadeghi, Zahra Yari

TL;DR
A healthy plant-based diet may lower the risk of gallstone disease, while an unhealthy plant-based diet may increase it.
Contribution
This study demonstrates that diet quality within plant-based eating significantly affects gallstone disease risk.
Findings
A healthful plant-based diet reduced gallstone disease risk by up to 67% after adjusting for confounders.
An unhealthy plant-based diet increased gallstone disease risk by up to 2.2-fold.
Higher adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was inversely associated with gallstone disease.
Abstract
Recent studies have emphasized the role of plant-based diets in reducing the risk of gallstone disease (GD) by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the association between plant-based diet indices and GD risk. 189 patients with newly diagnosed GD and 342 healthy controls participated in this case-control study. To assess overall adherence to a plant-based diet, three indices were calculated based on dietary data from the food frequency questionnaire: the plant-based dietary index (PDI), the healthful PDI (hPDI), and the unhealthful PDI (uhPDI). The association between plant-based diet indices and the risk of GD was assessed using logistic regression models. A significant and inverse association was observed between PDI and the risk of GD, with an odds reduction of 48% in the crude model, 56% when adjusted for age and sex, and 59% when adjusted…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Men, % | 49.7 | 47 | 17.2 | < 0.001 |
| Age (y) | 55.1 ± 14.6 | 54.6 ± 12.5 | 48.9 ± 11.7 | < 0.001 |
| IPAQ level, % | 0.283 | |||
| 1 | 80 | 72 | 74 | |
| 2 | 18 | 24 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| Alcohol drinker, % | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 0.959 |
| Smoker, % | 20 | 16.4 | 7.7 | 0.004 |
| Weight, kg | 71.7 ± 14.7 | 73.8 ± 13.8 | 74.1 ± 11.6 | 0.196 |
| Height, cm | 165.1 ± 9.4 | 165.8 ± 8.8 | 163.2 ± 7.9 | 0.015 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 26.3 ± 4.8 | 26.8 ± 4.3 | 27.8 ± 3.7 | 0.004 |
| Calorie intake (kcal/day) | 2193 ± 593 | 2459 ± 610 | 2426 ± 626 | < 0.001 |
| PDI | 53.6 ± 1.9 | 58.5 ± 1.3 | 66.3 ± 4 | < 0.001 |
| hPDI | 60 ± 2.9 | 63 ± 3.2 | 67.8 ± 3.9 | < 0.001 |
| uPDI | 76.5 ± 2.3 | 75.2 ± 3.1 | 71.3 ± 4.4 | < 0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Men, % | 46.5 | 58.7 | 83.5 | < 0.001 |
| Age (y) | 52.5 ± 15.6 | 54.6 ± 11.2 | 50.9 ± 12.2 | 0.035 |
| IPAQ level, % | 0.005 | |||
| 1 | 84 | 71 | 68 | |
| 2 | 15 | 26 | 26 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| Alcohol drinker | 2.9 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.819 |
| Smoker, % | 21 | 15 | 8 | 0.003 |
| Weight, kg | 72.6 ± 14.7 | 73.6 ± 13.1 | 73.9 ± 12.1 | 0.668 |
| Height, cm | 166.1 ± 9.4 | 165.2 ± 8.7 | 163.1 ± 7.8 | 0.006 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 26.9 ± 4.5 | 26.9 ± 4.2 | 27.8 ± 4 | 0.007 |
| Calorie intake (kcal/day) | 2364 ± 663 | 2388 ± 621 | 2292 ± 599 | 0.355 |
| PDI | 55.1 ± 3.3 | 58.7 ± 3.5 | 65.2 ± 5.3 | < 0.001 |
| uPDI | 58.8 ± 1.9 | 63.3 ± 1.2 | 69.2 ± 2.8 | < 0.001 |
| uPDI | 76.6 ± 2.7 | 74.9 ± 3.2 | 70.1 ± 3.8 | < 0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Men, % | 12.4 | 48.1 | 52.8 | < 0.001 |
| Age (y) | 49.6 ± 12.1 | 53.1 ± 12.8 | 55.8 ± 14.2 | < 0.001 |
| IPAQ level, % | 0.422 | |||
| 1 | 73 | 74 | 79 | |
| 2 | 22 | 23 | 19 | |
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | |
| Alcohol drinker | 0.6 | 2.7 | 4 | 0.122 |
| Smoker, % | 7 | 18.6 | 18.2 | 0.003 |
| Weight, kg | 72.5 ± 11.8 | 73.6 ± 14.7 | 73.5 ± 13.6 | 0.711 |
| Height, cm | 162.2 ± 7.5 | 166.4 ± 9.3 | 165.4 ± 8.9 | < 0.001 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 27.5 ± 3.9 | 26.5 ± 4.8 | 26.9 ± 4.6 | 0.082 |
| Calorie intake (kcal/day) | 2341 ± 624 | 2338 ± 573 | 2405 ± 646 | 0.528 |
| PDI | 64.3 ± 5.8 | 57.8 ± 4.4 | 56.4 ± 3.6 | < 0.001 |
| hPDI | 67.6 ± 4.3 | 62.9 ± 3.3 | 60.4 ± 3.1 | < 0.001 |
| uPDI | 69.5 ± 2.8 | 75.1 ± 1 | 78.3 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||
| No. of cases | 86 | 58 | 45 | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | ref | 0.61 (0.39-0.93) | 0.52 (0.33-0.81) | 0.004 |
| Model 2 | ref | 0.58 (0.38-0.91) | 0.44 (0.27-0.71) | 0.001 |
| Model 3 | ref | 0.62 (0.38-1) | 0.41 (0.24-0.69) | 0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| No. of cases | 43 | 60 | 86 | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | ref | 0.43 (0.27-0.67) | 0.47 (0.3-0.74) | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | ref | 0.32 (0.2-0.52) | 0.29 (0.17-0.49) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | ref | 0.36 (0.21-0.58) | 0.33 (0.2-0.6) | < 0.001 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| No. of cases | 43 | 61 | 85 | < 0.001 |
| Model 1 | ref | 1.3 (0.46-4.6) | 1.7 (1.1-2.6) | 0.012 |
| Model 2 | ref | 1.2 (1.1-1.4) | 2.1 (1.2-3.5) | 0.001 |
| Model 3 | ref | 1.47 (0.41-5.3) | 2.2 (1.3-3.5) | 0.003 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders · Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery · Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Introduction
Gallstone disease (GD), or cholelithiasis, is a hepatobiliary condition that affects 10% to 20% of adults worldwide and is associated with the most substantial socioeconomic complications.^1^ Moreover, a recent analysis of National Health Service data revealed a 72.2% increase in the total number of cholecystectomies performed annually between 2000 and 2019.^2^ Due to this condition, the United States incurs an annual direct cost of $5.8 billion.^3^ In a study conducted on cadavers, the prevalence of GD in Iran was reported to be 6.3%.^4^ Age above 40, genetic predisposition, ethnic background, female sex, and being pregnant are all non-modifiable risk factors for the development of gallstones. Other modifiable risk factors include obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, extreme weight loss, high-calorie food consumption, some medications, smoking, and inactive lifestyle.^5,6^
According to nutritional epidemiologists, assessing dietary patterns rather than focusing on individual food components can better reveal the relationship between diet and health status.^7^ Several studies have shown that diets rich in animal proteins, carbohydrates, and cholesterol increase the risk of GD, while diets high in vegetables, fruits, and total fiber reduce the risk.^8^ In this regard, new indices have been proposed, including the plant-based dietary index (PDI), the healthful PDI (hPDI), and the unhealthful PDI (uhPDI). The PDI assesses overall adherence to a plant-based diet, and the hPDI measures higher adherence to healthy plant foods (such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, and legumes) and lower adherence to unhealthy plant foods (refined grains and foods high in sugar), whereas the uhPDI scores the opposite. In all three indices, animal foods receive a negative score.^9^
To the best of our knowledge, there have been limited studies published on the association between the risk of gallstone formation and plant-based dietary indices. For the first time, in this case-control study, we evaluated whether adherence to a healthful versus an unhealthful version of a plant-based diet was associated with the risk of GD occurrence in Iranian adults.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Population
The methodology of this study has been fully described elsewhere.^10^ Here, additional explanations are provided briefly. Between November 2017 and October 2018, this case-control study was conducted at Taleghani Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The cases involved patients with gallstones or common bile duct (CBD) stones, confirmed by ultrasonography, for a period of one month or less. The age- and sex- matched control group was composed of patients who were admitted to the other departments of the same hospital and did not have a history of GD, CBD, or hepatic conditions that were confirmed by ultrasonography. Participants had to be 18 years or older and willing to participate in the research program. Patients with a history of autoimmune conditions, malignancies, and inflammatory or infectious conditions, as well as pregnant or lactating mothers, were also excluded. Of the total 617 patients studied, 66 were ineligible and 551 patients were included in the study, 20 of whom were excluded due to incomplete data. Finally, 342 controls and 189 cases were retained. Each participant completed a written informed consent form. The Ethics Committee of the Research Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases (IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1396.159) approved the protocol of the study.
Dietary Assessment and PDI, hPDI, and uhPDI Calculations
A reliable and valid semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess the food consumption of subjects during the year preceding their gallstone diagnosis in cases, as well as hospital admissions in the control group. Although recall bias is inevitable in FFQ, to reduce it, an experienced nutritionist was instructed to complete the questionnaire, and a food picture album was also provided to the patients to estimate sizes and quantities. The interviewer asked the subjects to indicate their daily, weekly, monthly, or annual consumption frequency for each food item, and then the obtained data were converted to grams. The Nutritionist IV software was used to analyze the collected data. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) provided the Food Composition Table (FCT), which we used to calculate the energy and nutritional values.
Three plant-based dietary indices were calculated, including PDI, hPDI, and uhPDI, following the methodology outlined by Satija et al.^11^ Eighteen groups of foods were established to represent both healthy and unhealthy plant-based foods, with categorizations derived from the existing literature regarding their associations with chronic diseases (see Supplementary Table S1 from Satija).^11^ These food groups were split into quintiles of consumption, with each quintile being assigned a score ranging from 1 to 5. In the setting of the PDI, participants were assigned a score of 5 for each plant food group if their consumption was in the highest quintile, a score of 4 for the second-highest quintile, and so forth, which eventually resulted in a score of 1 for consumption in the lowest quintile (indicating positive scores). Also, participants in the highest quintile of animal-based food groups were assigned a score of 1, a score of 2 for consumption in the second-highest quintile, and so forth. A score of 5 was given for consumption in the lowest quintile, indicating reverse scores.
For the hPDI, positive scores were assigned to healthy plant-based food groups, while negative scores were assigned to less healthy plant-based foods and animal-based foods. In contrast, for the uhPDI, positive scores were assigned to less healthy plant-based foods, while reverse scores were assigned to healthy plant-based foods and animal-based foods. Finally, these three indices were divided into tertiles to examine their associations with the risk of gallstone formation.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS software version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). We assessed the normality of the variables via a histogram and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. This research presents the baseline characteristics and dietary intakes of participants, expressed as means ± SD for quantitative variables and as percentages (%) for qualitative variables. Participants were divided into three tertiles based on PDI, hPDI, and uhPDI scores and compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed variables and chi-square for categorical parameters, respectively. Crude and multivariable-adjusted models of logistic regressions were used to illustrate the probabilities of GD across each tertile of the dietary indices: PDI, hPDI, and uhPDI. The adjusted model accounted for confounding factors, including age, sex, BMI, caloric intake, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol use.
Results
Table 1 presents the general characteristics of the study participants across tertiles of PDI, hPDI, and uhPDI. Individuals with higher PDI scores tended to be younger, more frequently female, less likely to smoke, taller, had higher caloric intake, lower BMI, and higher hPDI scores, along with lower uhPDI scores. Similarly, participants with the highest hPDI scores were generally younger, more often male, less likely to smoke, appeared taller, were more physically active, had higher body mass index (BMI), and also showed higher PDI and hPDI scores with lower uhPDI scores. Conversely, those with higher uhPDI scores were older, more likely to be male, exhibited higher smoking rates, were taller, and had lower PDI and hPDI scores, but higher uhPDI scores.
Table 2 presents multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for GD across tertiles of the dietary indices, including PDI, hPDI, and uhPDI. The crude model revealed a significant reverse association between the PDI (48% lower) and hPDI (53% lower) scores and the odds of GD. After adjustment for confounding factors, including age, sex, energy intake, BMI, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol intake, this association was strengthened. Also, in the crude model, an increase in uhPDI score was associated with a 70% increase in the odds of developing GD. After adjusting for age and sex, this association became stronger (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.5, P trend = 0.001). Additionally, in the multivariable-adjusted model (Model 3), this association remained significant (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.3-3.5, *P *trend = 0.003).
Discussion
There is no doubt that diet is a critical factor in the development of GD. This article aimed to investigate the association between a plant-based diet and GD. For a better understanding of the level of adherence to a healthy plant-based diet, three indices, including PDI, uPDI, and hPDI were determined. According to our results, higher PDI and hPDI contribute to lower GD odds, and a higher uhPDI score was associated with higher odds of GD. These associations persist after adjusting for co-factors.
A recent study of 5673 participants from NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) showed that a higher uPDI score was associated with a 53% increased risk of GD but failed to show a significant association between PDI, hPDI, and GD.^12^ One of the most important differences between this study and ours was the use of a 24-hour food recall instead of an FFQ, which may not fully reflect the participants’ usual dietary intake and cannot account for daily variations. Several studies have examined plant-based diets, such as vegetarian diets and the risk of GD, and conflicting results have been reported. A Taiwanese study compared the risk of symptomatic GD in vegetarians versus non-vegetarians, involving 4839 people, and showed that a vegetarian diet was associated with a reduced risk of GD in women, but not in men.^13^ In contrast, a cohort study of British vegetarians and non-vegetarians, comprising 49,652 adults followed for 13.85 years, revealed a small but significant positive association between a vegetarian diet and symptomatic GD.^14^ The researchers stated that since cholecystokinin (CCK), which plays a crucial role in gallbladder contraction, is stimulated to a lesser extent by fats and carbohydrates, it appears that consuming less fat may lead to increased gallbladder stasis by reducing CCK stimulation. Vegetarian diets appear to vary across populations and cultures, with East Asians typically consuming fruits and vegetables rich in fiber, antioxidants, and phytochemicals (higher hPDI scores). However, European vegetarian diets tend to be higher in starch (higher uhPDI scores). This could explain the different findings of the studies.
Although the pathogenesis of the disease and the mechanisms of its association with a plant-based diet are not wholly understood, studies have, to a limited extent, examined existing hypotheses. Some of the proposed mechanisms include: insulin resistance,^1,15^ increased hepatic cholesterol synthesis,^1^ serum LDL-C level,^1,16^ inflammatory status,^17^ obesity,^1,15^ hyper-secretion of cholesterol into bile,^1^ and adherence to an unhealthy diet (high uhPDI score) with a high intake of refined grains and starches,^18,19^ high-cholesterol and high-fat foods.^20^ The association of a plant-based diet with some of these risk factors has been investigated, showing promising results in reducing the risk of GD following a high-PDI diet. In a study by Chang et al,^13^ it was shown that a plant-based diet can reduce serum cholesterol, which in turn is associated with a reduced risk of GD. The researchers also showed that a plant-based diet is more effective in those with normal cholesterol levels and in women. This is imperative because the prevalence of GD in women is about twice as high as in men. Another possible mechanism for the association of plant-based diets with reduced risk of GD is their high fiber content. Fiber may decrease cholesterol absorption by reducing intestinal transit time, thereby reducing the risk of GD.^21,22^
In a 2019 study, Cortés and colleagues examined the association between insulin resistance (IR) and the risk of GD and proposed several mechanisms.^15^ IR appears to cause GD by increasing hepatic cholesterol secretion into bile and cholesterol saturation. IR also reduces bile acid synthesis by inhibiting enzymes of the bile acid biosynthesis pathway. On the other hand, hypomotility of the gallbladder due to IR can cause cholesterol crystallization and stimulate gallstone formation. IR is also associated with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, which is strongly associated with GD. Both conditions share the same metabolic pathways.^15^ Recent research has shown that plant-based or vegetarian diets can improve IR.^19,23^ The primary reasons a plant-based diet can reduce IR include weight loss, decreased visceral fat, lower saturated fat content, and increased fiber, antioxidant, and plant sterol content.^24^
Inflammation is a major factor in the pathogenesis of GS, as in many diseases.^25-27^ Inflammatory conditions impair the gallbladder’s ability, such as pH regulation, absorption, and contraction. Also, inflammation stimulates cholesterol crystallization through the stimulation of mucin and immune-related proteins. For instance, hs-CRP is thought to cause thickening of the gallbladder wall and decrease its motility, which in turn is associated with impaired bile emptying and gallstone formation.^26^
Various studies have pointed to the role of a healthy plant-based diet in reducing inflammation and related diseases.^28-30^ The fiber content of plant-based diets appears to play a role in this association. On the one hand, dietary fiber improves the intestinal barrier by modifying the gut microbiota and reducing inflammatory biomarkers. On the other hand, fiber, by reducing energy density, can help alleviate obesity, which is a pro-inflammatory condition and a risk factor for GD. Additionally, plant-based diets are rich in phytochemicals and polyphenols, which act as anti-inflammatory agents and increase the body’s antioxidant capacity.^28-30^
The limitations of the study should be considered when interpreting and generalizing the results. In this case-control study, the causal relationship between exposure and outcome is not clear. Additionally, the FFQ was used to collect dietary data, which is prone to recall bias; however, we adjusted the results accordingly. It is also worth noting that not all confounders can be adjusted for in the analyses.
Conclusion
Overall, the results indicated a significant inverse association between a healthy plant-based diet and a reduced risk of GD. Additional interventional and exploratory studies in larger populations are recommended to confirm and generalize the findings.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Sun H Warren J Yip J Ji Y Hao S Han W Factors influencing gallstone formation: a review of the literature Biomolecules 202212455010.3390/biom 1204055035454138 PMC 9026518 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Lunevicius R Nzenwa IC Mesri M A nationwide analysis of gallbladder surgery in England between 2000 and 2019 Surgery 202217122768410.1016/j.surg.2021.10.02534782153 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Sandler RS Everhart JE Donowitz M Adams E Cronin K Goodman C The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States Gastroenterology 2002122515001110.1053/gast.2002.3297811984534 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Farzaneh Sheikh Ahmad E Tofighi Zavvareh H Gharadaghi J Sheikhvatan M Prevalence and characteristics of gallstone disease in an Iranian population: a study on cadavers Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2007655091217897915 · pubmed ↗
- 5Marschall HU Einarsson C Gallstone disease J Intern Med 200726165294210.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01783.x 17547709 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Littlefield A Lenahan C Cholelithiasis: presentation and management J Midwifery Womens Health 20196432899710.1111/jmwh.1295930908805 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Hu FB Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology Curr Opin Lipidol 20021313910.1097/00041433-200202000-0000211790957 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Wirth J Song M Fung TT Joshi AD Tabung FK Chan AT Diet-quality scores and the risk of symptomatic gallstone disease: a prospective cohort study of male US health professionals Int J Epidemiol 201847619384610.1093/ije/dyy 21030312404 PMC 6280928 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
