# Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Impact of Allied Health – Translating Research into Practice (AH-TRIP) Program on the Knowledge Translation Capacity of the Allied Health Workforce

## TL;DR

This study evaluated how a program improved allied health professionals' ability to use research in practice and found ways to enhance its impact.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the impact of a KT program using FAIT methodology and identifies strategies to optimize its effectiveness.

## Key findings

- Six domains of impact were identified, including individual and workforce capacity building and patient benefits.
- Enablers included program flexibility, mentor access, and manager support, while barriers included clinician time and staff turnover.
- Strategies for managers can improve research literacy and create supportive contexts for KT.

## Abstract

Knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare is a complex process. Building the KT capacity of the workforce is fundamental to closing the gaps between research and evidence-based practice. This evaluation aimed to describe the impact of a KT capacity building program (Allied Health Translating Research into Practice, AH-TRIP) on allied health professionals and health services and systems, with the secondary aim of identifying barriers and enablers to program impact.

Multi methods evaluation using online surveys and semi-structured interviews with 20 program participants and their managers. The interview guide was underpinned by the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT). Deductive content analysis was used to categorise impact against FAIT, with barriers and enablers mapped to an implementation framework.

Six domains of impact were identified: Individual Capacity Building, Workforce Capacity Building, Enhanced Networks, Clinical Practice Change, Patient/Community Benefits, and Economic Benefits. Enablers of impact were program design (flexibility, access to mentors, funding opportunities), local contexts supporting research (manager support, access to local experts), and previous exposure to KT. Consistent barriers included a lack of clinician time and confidence in KT, staff turnover (particularly in regional/rural areas), lack of organisational research culture, and short-term funding cycles.

Using FAIT methodology, we have demonstrated significant impact achieved by a KT capacity building program for individual health professionals and the broader allied health workforce and health services and systems. Impact could be further optimised by strategies targeted at managers to create supportive contexts for KT through improving research literacy in health decision and policy contexts and innovative workforce planning.