# Intelligent robot-assisted fracture reduction for pelvic fractures: a clinical study

**Authors:** Xinyu Fan, Jianlin He, Baochuang Qi, Hu Zhang, Gang Li, Xingqiang Liu, Wei Yu, Nuocheng Yang, Yin Yang, Yongqing Xu

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1744048 · Frontiers in Medicine · 2026-02-18

## TL;DR

A robot-assisted system successfully treated unstable pelvic fractures with minimal invasion, showing good safety and recovery outcomes.

## Contribution

This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility and safety of an intelligent robot-assisted fracture reduction system for unstable pelvic injuries.

## Key findings

- The RAFR system achieved a 90.6% excellent-to-good reduction rate in unstable pelvic fractures.
- No major complications were observed in patients treated with the robotic system.
- Functional outcomes, as measured by the Majeed score, were favorable with a mean score of 76.7.

## Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and radiographic outcomes of an intelligent robot-assisted fracture reduction (RAFR) system in the minimally invasive treatment of fresh, unstable pelvic ring injuries.

In this single-center retrospective case series, 32 consecutive patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries (Tile type B or C) treated between August 2024 and April 2025 underwent minimally invasive closed reduction and internal fixation using the RAFR system. The system combines preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional reduction planning, intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) registration, an optical tracking system, a table-mounted passive holding arm, and a robotic arm with dual force–position monitoring. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopic exposures were recorded. Postoperative CT was used to measure residual displacement, which was graded according to Matta’s criteria, and the excellent-to-good rate was calculated. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Majeed score at the final follow-up.

All 32 procedures were completed using a closed, minimally invasive approach without conversion to open reduction. The median (IQR) operative time was 270 (225–311) min, blood loss was 150 (100–300) mL, and fluoroscopic exposures were 35 (30–45). The median residual displacement on CT was 4.0 (3.0–8.0) mm. According to Matta’s criteria, 17 patients (53.1%) had excellent, 12 (37.5%) had good, and 3 (9.4%) had fair reductions, yielding an excellent-to-good rate of 90.6%. Two patients were lost to follow-up; among the remaining 30 patients, no major complications such as deep infection, implant failure, or iatrogenic neurovascular injury were observed, and the mean Majeed score was 76.7 ± 12.0.

The RAFR system enabled closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of a heterogeneous cohort of unstable pelvic ring fractures with high rates of satisfactory reduction and favorable short-term functional recovery. These preliminary findings support the clinical feasibility and safety of robot-assisted closed reduction for unstable pelvic fractures and provide a basis for future comparative and multicenter studies.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** comminution (MESH:D018460), unstable (MESH:D000789), LC-1 (MESH:C538557), urogenital injuries (MESH:D000091642), Tile B/C fractures (MESH:D019694), chronic pain (MESH:D059350), pelvic deformity (MESH:D034161), deformities (MESH:D009140), XL (MESH:D000080345), neurovascular injuries (MESH:D013901), vertebral fractures (MESH:C535781), infection (MESH:D007239), Tile C (OMIM:211750), blood (MESH:D006402), arthrosis (MESH:D010003), fatigue (MESH:D005221), pelvic ring disruptions (MESH:D012303), blood loss (MESH:D016063), osteoporotic (MESH:D058866), lumbar fractures (MESH:C563613), thoracic trauma (MESH:D013896), polytrauma (MESH:D009104), extremity fractures (MESH:D050723), Injuries (MESH:D014947)
- **Chemicals:** heparin (MESH:D006493)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958122/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958122/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958122/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12958122