# Identifying and selecting outcome measures for the children and families domestic abuse core outcome set

**Authors:** Shivi Bains, Elizabeth Dunk, Jenna Harewell, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Christine Barter, Elaine Fulton, Yo Jackson, Melissa Kimber, Amanda McIntyre, Simona Skripkauskaite, Eszter Szilassy, Lazaros Gonidis, Emma Howarth, Claire Powell

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2026.1680919 · Frontiers in Sociology · 2026-02-18

## TL;DR

This study identifies and selects outcome measures for children and families affected by domestic abuse to improve consistency in research and practice.

## Contribution

The study develops a core outcome set with recommended tools for measuring family relationships and feelings of safety in domestic abuse interventions.

## Key findings

- Eight outcome measurement instruments were identified and reduced to two subscales for family relationships and feelings of safety.
- No suitable instrument was found for measuring freedom to go about daily life.
- Further work is needed to develop a new tool for the unmet outcome and ensure the set's applicability to diverse communities.

## Abstract

The evidence base for child-focused domestic abuse (DA) interventions is weak. Part of the challenge is that studies measure a range of different outcomes using different outcome measurement instruments (OMI). To address this, a core outcome set (COS) comprising five outcomes was developed. The current study aimed to: (1) identify relevant OMIs and assess their quality for three outcomes in the DA-COS (family relationships, feelings of safety, freedom to go about daily life); and (2) reach consensus between participants on acceptable OMIs for use in research and practice contexts.

We carried out a four-stage mixed-methods process to identify, appraise, and reach consensus on relevant tools including targeted, systematic literature searches, participant workshops to define outcome concepts, OMI appraisal of psychometrics and acceptability, and a multi-participant consensus workshop to reach consensus on OMI selection. In total, 239 OMIs were initially identified and reduced to 18 through a systematic appraisal process. Following a rating process of acceptability and feasibility, eight OMIs were taken to a final consensus workshop which resulted in the identification and provisional recommendation of two subscales from a newly developed tool for family relationships and feelings of safety. No suitable OMI was recommended for freedom to go about daily life.

This work is the next step toward the development of a child and family-focused DA-COS, that we hope will enable co-ordinated outcome measurement within and between practice and research. Further work is needed to adapt and evaluate the selected OMI as well as to develop a new tool to measure freedom to go about daily life. Work is needed to support the implementation of the DA-COS, ensure its applicability to families with diverse needs or from underserved communities and to track the benefits and potential harms of its use in this field.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** depression (MESH:D003866), OMI (MESH:D005547), intimate partner violence (MESH:C563733), trauma (MESH:D014947), COS (MESH:D020512), Mental Wellbeing (MESH:D008607), CAFADA (MESH:C535569), Abuse (MESH:D019966), child maltreatment (MESH:C562515), anxiety (MESH:D001007), mental ill-health (OMIM:603663)
- **Chemicals:** CAFADA (-)
- **Species:** Enterovirus D (no rank) [taxon 138951], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Enterovirus C (no rank) [taxon 138950], Crohivirus B (no rank) [taxon 2169854]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956635/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956635/full.md

## References

111 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956635/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956635