# Language, silence, and logic: Zen, Nishida, and fthe Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in cognitive and cultural perspectives

## TL;DR

This paper explores how Zen and Nishida's philosophy challenge language's role in shaping thought, offering a new model for understanding cognition and culture.

## Contribution

It introduces a 'Middle Way' framework integrating silence and dialectical expression from Eastern philosophy into linguistic science.

## Key findings

- Zen's nonverbal practices and Nishida's philosophy complementarily transcend linguistic relativism.
- The proposed framework offers a novel model for cross-cultural psychology and education.
- A pedagogical case study illustrates its practical application in cross-cultural teaching.

## Abstract

This study employs a weakened version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis as its analytical framework. Through comparative conceptual analysis, it examines Zen Buddhism’s nonverbal practices (koans and silence) and Nishida Kitaro’s dialectical philosophy of language (pure experience, absolute contradictory self-identity, and the logic of place) as two core conceptual cases. It proposes and argues for a “Middle Way” theoretical framework that integrates silence with dialectical expression. This framework acknowledges the habitual shaping of cognition by linguistic structures while elucidating how Zen Buddhism, through the radical suspension of language, and Nishida, through dialectical reconstruction within language, complementarily transcend the cognitive limitations revealed by linguistic relativism. This study offers a novel theoretical model grounded in Eastern philosophy for linguistic science and cross-cultural psychology. It demonstrates its operational potential in cross-cultural education through an illustrative pedagogical case study (presented as a qualitative teaching narrative).