# Adoption and implementation of teleaudiology as a telehealth model in Jordan and Arab countries: A cross-sectional survey

**Authors:** Hala M. AlOmari, Hanady Bani Hani, Telda Alkhateeb, Dua’ Qutaishat, Rohit Ravi, Rohit Ravi, Rohit Ravi

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343923 · PLOS One · 2026-03-03

## TL;DR

This study explores how audiologists in Jordan and Arab countries adopted teleaudiology, especially after the pandemic, and identifies barriers and opportunities for its expansion.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into teleaudiology adoption patterns and challenges among audiologists in the Arab region.

## Key findings

- 46.9% of audiologists reported providing telehealth services, with many starting post-pandemic.
- Younger professionals and public institution employees were more likely to use teleaudiology.
- Most non-providers (94%) expressed interest in adopting teleaudiology in the future.

## Abstract

Telehealth is the provision of healthcare services remotely via telecommunications technology. The implementation, clinical applications, and perceived effectiveness of telehealth among audiologists across the Arab region, particularly following its accelerated adoption due to the COVID-19 pandemic was investigated.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and June 2024 among 194 audiologists from multiple countries. A non-probability purposive sampling approach was implemented. The respondents were grouped into providers and non-providers of telehealth services. The questionnaire collected data on demographics, service delivery models, telehealth applications, training background, and perceived challenges. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed to identify predictors of teleaudiology adoption.

46.9% of the sample reported providing telehealth services. Many of them (69.2%) indicated that they began offering telehealth services following the COVID-19 pandemic. Synchronous delivery was commonly utilised. Younger professionals and those employed in public institutions were more likely to engage in remote service delivery (p< 0.05). Barriers included limited formal training and limited infrastructure. Remarkably, 94% of non-providers expressed interest in implementing teleaudiology in the future.

The audiologists’ reported perceptions and experiences indicate that teleaudiology remains limited in clinical diagnostic service delivery. Broader integration of teleaudiology practices may benefit from enhanced professional training, the development of standardised guidelines, and investment in technological infrastructure to support access to remote hearing healthcare.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tinnitus (MESH:D014012), hearing loss (MESH:D034381), ACADEMIC EDITOR (MESH:D007859), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Chemicals:** PONE-D-25-56541R1 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956131/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956131/full.md

## References

37 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956131/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12956131