# From de‐skilling to up‐skilling: How artificial intelligence will augment the modern physician

**Authors:** Felix C. Oettl, James Pruneski, Balint Zsidai, Yinan Yu, David Fendrich, Thomas Tischer, Michael T. Hirschmann, Stefano Zaffagnini, Kristian Samuelsson

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70677 · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2026-03-03

## TL;DR

This paper discusses how AI in orthopaedics will change physicians' roles from routine tasks to complex decision-making, emphasizing the need for new training to avoid skill loss.

## Contribution

The paper introduces the concepts of 'deskilling' and 'never-skilling' in AI-augmented medicine and advocates for educational strategies to ensure AI supports professional growth.

## Key findings

- AI in orthopaedics currently acts as an assistant, not a replacement, for physicians.
- Training paradigms must evolve to ensure AI supports clinical excellence rather than eroding skills.
- AI can free physicians to focus on complex decisions, procedures, and patient care.

## Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into orthopaedic practice is no longer a theoretical future but an inevitable reality. As AI models increasingly demonstrate superior performance in specific diagnostic and administrative tasks, concerns have arisen regarding the potential replacement of physicians and the erosion of clinical competency. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence to reframe the debate from a fear of replacement to a strategy of augmentation. Pathways leading to ‘deskilling’—the loss of existing expertise—and the emerging threat of ‘never‐skilling’, where trainees fail to acquire foundational proficiencies due to premature reliance on automation, are analysed. Current AI applications function primarily as assistants rather than autonomous agents, offering an opportunity for ‘upskilling’ by liberating clinicians from repetitive administrative burdens and standardizing diagnostic accuracy. However, realizing this benefit requires deliberate educational mechanisms; one has to argue that maintaining clinical excellence requires a shift in training paradigms, emphasizing critical oversight where human reasoning validates AI outputs. AI will not replace the orthopaedic surgeon in the foreseeable future; rather, it will necessitate an evolution of the physician's role. By automating routine tasks, AI allows the modern physician to operate at a higher level, focusing on complex decision‐making, procedural excellence and patient empathy. The future requires mechanisms to ensure AI remains a tool for professional elevation rather than a catalyst for skill degradation.

Level V.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fracture (MESH:D050723), lung disease (MESH:D008171), AI (MESH:C538142), adenoma (MESH:D000236), burnout (MESH:D002055), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), polyp (MESH:D011127)
- **Chemicals:** Nabla (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12955832/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12955832/full.md

## References

70 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12955832/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12955832