Corrigendum: Navigating Through Innovation in Elderly’s Health: A Scoping Review of Digital Health Interventions
Macarena Hirmas-Adauy, Carla Castillo-Laborde, Camila Awad, Anita Jasmen, Maurizio Mattoli, Xaviera Molina, Andrea Olea, Isabel Matute, Fernando Soto, Paola Rubilar, Oscar Urrejola, Tania Alfaro, María Teresa Abusleme Lama, Sophie Esnouf
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology Use by Older Adults · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Digital Mental Health Interventions
One data was unintentionally omitted in Table 2 “Summary of characteristics of included documents according to PCC model (Population, Context, Concept) (Worldwide, 2022)” as published.
In this table, next to the word caregivers, there should be a parenthesis with (n = 139). As it appears in healthcare level which has (n = 111).
In addition, in the percentage’s column, the data of Family/Informal, Formal and Not specified should be modified by replacing:
- -17.3 with 52.5 in Family/Informal
- -12.4 with 37.4 in Formal
- -12.8 with 38.8 in Not specified
The corrected Table 2 appears below.
In the first published version of the article, on page 5, the % of caregivers was calculated using a different criterion.
A correction has been made to Results, Population, Paragraph 1. The correct paragraph is: “The interventions were primarily aimed at the elderly population (93.3%, n = 393), followed by healthcare professionals (48.0%, n = 202), and caregivers (33.0%, n = 139). Among the interventions focused on caregivers, the most studied group were family or informal caregivers (52.5%, n = 73) (Table 2).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.