Correction: Range-wide assessment of habitat suitability for jaguars using multiscale species distribution modelling
Guilherme Costa Alvarenga, Caroline C. Sartor, Samuel A. Cushman, Alexandra Zimmermann, Ana Carolina Srbek-Araujo, Ana Cristina Mendes-Oliveira, Bart Harmsen, Carlos De Angelo, Carolina Franco Esteves, Claudia B. de Campos, Daiana Jeronimo Polli, Diego F. Passos Viana
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpecies Distribution and Climate Change · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-025-30512-5, published online 24 December 2025
The original version of this Article contained an error in the order of the Figures. Figure 1 was published as Figure 2, Figure 2 was published as Figure 3, Figure 3 was published as Figure 4, Figure 4 was published as Figure 5, and Figure 5 was published as Figure 1.
The original Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and accompanying legends appear below.
In addition, the Introduction section contained an error. Consequently,
“This effort represents a unique contribution to jaguar research and conservation, providing governments and stakeholders with essential information to guide conservation planning and policy (Table 1 and Figure 1).”
now reads:
“This effort represents a unique contribution to jaguar research and conservation, providing governments and stakeholders with essential information to guide conservation planning and policy.”
Additionally, in the Results section, under the subheading ‘Conservation implications’,
“This dominance was also evident within JCUs and PAs (Figures 3A and 5A): the five units with the largest extents of highly suitable habitat were all located in the Amazon – a “Moist Broadleaf Forest”, together accounting for approximately 9.8 and 4.7 million km^2^ in JCUs and PAs, respectively (see Online Appendix S1 and S2 for detailed values).”
now reads:
“This dominance was also evident within JCUs and PAs (Figures 3A and 4A): the five units with the largest extents of highly suitable habitat were all located in the Amazon – a “Moist Broadleaf Forest”, together accounting for approximately 9.8 and 4.7 million km^2^ in JCUs and PAs, respectively (see Online Appendix S1 and S2 for detailed values).”
“This shift was mirrored in JCUs and PAs (Figures 3B and 5B).”
now reads:
“This shift was mirrored in JCUs and PAs (Figures 3B and 4B).”
Furthermore, in the Discussion section,
“As previously predicted^21^, the largest highly suitable areas are concentrated in the Serra do Mar region (Figure 1e) and the Green Corridor of Misiones (Figure 2f).”
now reads:
“As previously predicted^21^, the largest highly suitable areas are concentrated in the Serra do Mar region (Figure 1e) and the Green Corridor of Misiones (Figure 1f).”
The original Article has been corrected.