# Phase-specific postural adjustments in children and adults during a challenging balance task

**Authors:** Ludvík Valtr, Lucia Bizovská, Reza Abdollahipour, Bouwien Smits-Engelsman

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2026.1734938 · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · 2026-02-17

## TL;DR

The study compares how children and adults adjust their posture during a balance task, finding that adults use more efficient strategies while children rely more on external support.

## Contribution

The study introduces a sensitive framework for assessing developmental differences in postural control during complex balance tasks.

## Key findings

- Adults showed larger backward COP shifts and faster COP velocity during dynamic phases compared to children.
- Children exhibited greater reliance on external support, as indicated by higher GRF on the can.
- SPM revealed group differences mainly during stooping and straightening phases, not evident in static balance.

## Abstract

Anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) stabilize the body before voluntary movement. Although present early in life, their refinement continues into adolescence, especially during complex balance tasks.

This study examined developmental differences in APA control between typically developing children (9–12 years) and young adults (19–25 years) during a self-initiated Can Placement Task (CPT).

Thirty children and twenty-two adults performed the CPT while standing on one leg. The task was divided into five phases (quiet stance, stooping, can transfer, straightening up, stabilization). Center of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity in anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions and vertical ground reaction force (GRF) on the can were measured using dual force platforms. Both discrete outcomes and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) were analyzed.

No differences were observed in static balance (Phase I). In dynamic phases, adults showed larger backward COP shifts during stooping, higher normalized COP velocity, and reduced reliance on the can for support compared with children. Children exhibited slower COP adjustments and higher GRF on the can, indicating greater use of external support. SPM revealed group differences mainly during stooping and straightening phases. Adults’ faster COP control likely reflects efficient feedforward strategies, while children adopted more conservative, stability-oriented approaches.

Children aged 9–12 years can generate APAs but remain less efficient in adapting them to task demands. Phase-specific and SPM analyses revealed subtle developmental differences not evident in static balance. The CPT provides a sensitive framework for assessing postural control and may guide age-appropriate clinical interventions.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CARD16 (caspase recruitment domain family member 16) [NCBI Gene 114769] {aka COP, COP1, LLID-114769, PSEUDO-ICE}, CHPT1 (choline phosphotransferase 1) [NCBI Gene 56994] {aka CPT, CPT1}
- **Diseases:** slowing of movement (MESH:D020754), neurological, musculoskeletal, or developmental disorders (MESH:D009140), APAs (MESH:D000275), developmental delays (MESH:D002658), BG dysfunction (MESH:D001480), Parkinson's disease (MESH:D010300)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12953375/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12953375/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12953375/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12953375