# Categorical identity signatures can reduce host error rates during brood parasitism

**Authors:** Tanmay Dixit, Ming Liu, Jana M. Riederer, Jonah M. Walker, Cameron J. Blair, Jess Lund, Collins Moya, Claire N. Spottiswoode, Taylor Hart, PhD, Taylor Hart, PhD, Taylor Hart, PhD

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003667 · PLOS Biology · 2026-02-20

## TL;DR

This study shows that categorical egg traits in birds can help hosts better recognize and reject parasitic eggs, reducing errors in both accepting foreign eggs and rejecting their own.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that categorical trait distributions can break the expected trade-off between Type I and Type II errors in host recognition.

## Key findings

- Zitting cisticolas with categorical egg signatures make fewer Type I and Type II errors compared to hosts with continuous variation.
- Category-based rejection mechanisms explain how categorical traits reduce error rates in host-parasite interactions.
- Categorical trait perception can reshape coevolutionary dynamics in mimicry and recognition systems.

## Abstract

Biological recognition is often modeled as involving discrimination of continuously-distributed (and continuously-perceived) traits according to decision thresholds. However, traits such as animal signals can be categorically distributed. Here, we test how such categorical distributions may influence fundamental trade-offs in signal recognition, using a brood parasite–host system involving identity recognition. The African cuckoo finch Anomalospiza imberbis parasitizes several host species, each of which has evolved inter-individual variation in egg appearance (“egg signatures”) that facilitates recognition and rejection of mimetic cuckoo finch eggs. We demonstrate that egg signature traits in one host species, the zitting cisticola Cisticola juncidis, are categorically distributed. Field experiments reveal that zitting cisticolas make fewer Type II errors (accepting parasitic eggs) and Type I errors (rejecting their own eggs) than hosts exhibiting continuous variation. This challenges the long-standing expectation (from classification models, statistics, and signal detection theory) of a strict trade-off between these two error types. Individual-based simulations clarify mechanisms by which categorical variation can generate low error rates, especially when combined with “category-based rejection”, whereby hosts only reject eggs of different categories to their own. Our findings show that the categorical distribution and category-based perception of trait variation can shape error trade-offs and coevolutionary dynamics, which should inform studies on other mimicry or self/non-self recognition systems, including immune recognition. They also highlight the importance of quantifying trait distributions and how they are perceived, when understanding coevolution between deceivers and those they deceive.

In brood parasitism, prior work predicts a trade-off in the host's error rates from accepting foreign eggs and rejecting their own eggs. This study combines comparative field experiments and simulations to show advantages when egg trait distributions are categorical, rather than continuous, with implications for other types of co-evolutionary arms races.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Anomalospiza imberbis (taxon 187417), Cisticola juncidis (taxon 52622)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** HLA-C (major histocompatibility complex, class I, C) [NCBI Gene 3107] {aka D6S204, HLA-JY3, HLAC, HLC-C, MHC, PSORS1}
- **Diseases:** TD (MESH:D004409), infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** cisticolas (-)
- **Species:** Prinia subflava (tawny-flanked prinia, species) [taxon 208062], Prinia (genus) [taxon 81891], Phoenicurus auroreus (Daurian redstart, species) [taxon 358814], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Anomalospiza imberbis (species) [taxon 187417], Cisticola juncidis (species) [taxon 52622], Sinosuthora alphonsiana (species) [taxon 2485304], Cuculus canorus (common cuckoo, species) [taxon 55661], Cephalophorus natalensis (Natal duiker, species) [taxon 69299]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952647/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952647/full.md

## References

68 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952647/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952647