# Revealing undergraduate biology students’ conception of variability and error bars within graphing

**Authors:** Lauren Stoczynski, David Zis, Anna Woodruff, Susan Maruca, Eli Meir, Joel K. Abraham, Stephanie M. Gardner, David R Wessner, David R Wessner, David R Wessner

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343301 · PLOS One · 2026-03-02

## TL;DR

This study explores how undergraduate biology students understand variability and error bars in graphs, finding that many lack sufficient instruction on these concepts.

## Contribution

The study introduces a coding framework for analyzing student conceptions of error bars and identifies variability in understanding based on graph types and majors.

## Key findings

- Students who created bar graphs with individual data points showed lower understanding of error bars.
- Four categories of student responses were identified: broad terms, error terms, purpose terms, and trend & analysis terms.
- Instruction on variability and error bars is insufficient in biology curricula.

## Abstract

Creating and interpreting graphs are quantitative reasoning skills all science, technology, engineering, and math students need to develop. In biology, data are lacking in our understanding of how undergraduate students interpret variability across different graph types or what knowledge students have about the data error bars represent. This study analyzed 3506 student responses within a graphing assessment. We developed a code book for students’ open-ended responses on the data error bars represent and used chi-square tests to look for significant differences in how students described error bars based on a graph they created and self-reported demographic data. We observed four major categories in how students described error bars: broad terms, error terms, purpose terms, and trend & analysis terms. When responses were linked with a graph the student made, those who created a bar graph with a bar for each data point showed lower understanding of error bars compared to students who themselves created a bar graph with aggregated means and error bars. We also observed differences in how students described error bars based on their major but did not observe differences based on whether students were in introductory or upper-level courses. Our results suggest that students are not receiving enough instruction on variability within graphing even though bar graphs with error bars are a common graph that students are asked to construct. More scaffolded repeated instruction is needed across biology curricula.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** TP53 (tumor protein p53) [NCBI Gene 7157] {aka BCC7, BMFS5, LFS1, P53, TRP53}
- **Chemicals:** PONE-D-25-48061R1 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952588/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952588/full.md

## References

61 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952588/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12952588