# Gelatine-based foams produced by enzymatic foaming: formulation–structure relationships affecting expansion and stability

**Authors:** Shwan Abdullah Hamad

PMC · DOI: 10.1039/d6ra00030d · RSC Advances · 2026-03-02

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new method to create biodegradable gelatine foams for wound dressings using enzymes, offering better control over expansion and stability.

## Contribution

A novel enzymatic foaming strategy for gelatine-based biomedical foams with tunable expansion and stability is introduced.

## Key findings

- Catalase-mediated oxygen generation enables rapid in situ foam formation at 37 °C.
- Optimal formulations balance expansion and stability with 2.0–3.0 wt% gelatine and 2.5–3.0 wt% glutaraldehyde.
- Excessive gas generation or cross-linking reduces foam structural integrity.

## Abstract

Gelatine-based foams are attractive wound-dressing materials due to their biocompatibility, conformability, and exudate-absorptive capacity; however, most reported systems rely on mechanical or chemical foaming routes that offer limited control over expansion and structural stability under physiological conditions. Here, a biodegradable gelatine-based solidified foam is developed via catalase-mediated enzymatic oxygen generation followed by glutaraldehyde-induced network stabilisation, enabling rapid in situ foam formation and fixation at 37 °C. A systematic parametric study was conducted to elucidate the effect of gelatine, hydrogen peroxide, catalase, and glutaraldehyde concentrations on foam expansion and 24 h volume retention. Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test) showed that foam behaviour reflects the interplay among enzymatic gas generation, interfacial stabilisation by gelatine, and matrix stiffening through covalent cross-linking. Excessive gas generation or cross-link density reduced structural integrity, whereas intermediate formulation ranges produced foams with improved expansion–stability balance. A practical formulation window was identified (2.0–3.0 wt% gelatine, 3.0–4.0 wt% hydrogen peroxide, 0.2 wt% catalase, and 2.5–3.0 wt% glutaraldehyde), providing a favourable compromise between high expansion and sustained volume retention over 24 h. These results provide formulation-level design guidance for enzymatically generated biomedical foams and support their potential as flexible, absorbent wound-dressing materials.

Catalase-mediated oxygen generation enables rapid in situ formation of structurally stabilised gelatine foams with tunable expansion, providing a controllable enzymatic strategy for advanced wound-dressing materials.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** Cat (Catalase)
- **Chemicals:** hydrogen peroxide (PubChem CID 784), glutaraldehyde (PubChem CID 3485)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CAT (catalase) [NCBI Gene 531682], CAT (catalase) [NCBI Gene 847]
- **Diseases:** malignancy (MESH:D009369), inflammation (MESH:D007249), infection (MESH:D007239), malnutrition (MESH:D044342)
- **Chemicals:** polymer (MESH:D011108), chitosan (MESH:D048271), alginate (MESH:D000464), Oxygen (MESH:D010100), silver (MESH:D012834), aldehyde (MESH:D000447), Schiff base (MESH:D012545), water (MESH:D014867), amino acid (MESH:D000596), amine (MESH:D000588), nicotine (MESH:D009538), Hydrogen peroxide (MESH:D006861), Enzymatic (-), imine (MESH:D007097), GA (MESH:D005976), lysine (MESH:D008239), Polyurethane (MESH:D011140), hydroxylysine (MESH:D006901), CO2 (MESH:D002245)
- **Species:** Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913]
- **Cell lines:** S2 — Drosophila melanogaster (Fruit fly), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_Z232)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951601/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951601/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951601/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951601