# Cultural differences in healthcare: An investigation using cognitive-affective mapping

**Authors:** Eva Buschmeyer, Lasse B. Sander, Andrea Kiesel, Irina Monno, Julius Fenn, Kerstin Spanhel, Ozlem Eylem-Van bergeijk, Muhammed-Talha Topcu, Muhammed-Talha Topcu

PMC · DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10126 · Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health · 2025-12-26

## TL;DR

This study explores the mental healthcare needs of refugees in Germany using a visual mapping technique to identify factors that support or hinder their well-being.

## Contribution

The study introduces cognitive-affective mapping as a novel method to explore refugee healthcare needs and cultural differences.

## Key findings

- Refugees identified 'resources' and 'possibilities for explicit treatments' as key supporting factors for their well-being.
- Hindering factors included 'psychological challenges', 'specific living conditions in Germany', and 'access to healthcare'.
- Differences in these factors were observed between refugee subsamples, suggesting the need for tailored healthcare approaches.

## Abstract

Refugees in Germany often do not receive the necessary mental healthcare. Understanding refugees’ healthcare needs, that is factors that support or hinder their health, can foster the development of effective, culturally appropriate and accessible health services. The present exploratory study investigated these needs using cognitive-affective maps (CAM), a recently developed mind map-like measurement technique enabling participants to visualise their thoughts and emotions as networks. Thirty refugees from diverse regions of origin (West Africa, Middle East and Ukraine) were asked to indicate factors supporting and hindering their health by drawing a CAM using a digital tool. We analysed the drawn CAM concepts qualitatively according to a five-step procedure, including deductive and inductive category formation. Drawn CAM concepts concerning supporting factors were grouped along the categories ‘resources’ and ‘possibilities for explicit treatments of healthcare needs’, suggesting an openness to promote well-being among refugees. Yet, various concepts were grouped along the categories ‘psychological challenges’, ‘specific living conditions in Germany’ and ‘access to healthcare’, focusing on factors hindering well-being. Frequency analyses of these categories suggested differences between the subsamples, which should be further investigated in future studies in order to integrate a possible heterogeneity within refugee populations in offered healthcare.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** mental and chronic diseases (MESH:D002908), CAM (MESH:D003072), depression (MESH:D003866), mental disorders (MESH:D001523), sleeping difficulties (MESH:D012893), head injury (MESH:D006259), pain (MESH:D010146), trauma (MESH:D014947), leg injury (MESH:D007869), human rights (MESH:C535682)
- **Chemicals:** CAM (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951343/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951343/full.md

## References

74 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951343/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951343