# Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Comparison between gastric and duodenal obstruction

**Authors:** Yorick L. van de Pavert, Maronne I.D. Pheifer, Louise W.H. van Leeuwen, Rina Bijlsma, Marco Bruno, Hendrik M. van Dullemen, Paul Fockens, Akin Inderson, Willem J. Lammers, Niels G. Venneman, Rogier P. Voermans, Roy L.J. van Wanrooij, Thomas R. de Wijkerslooth, Leon M.G. Moons, Frank P. Vleggaar

PMC · DOI: 10.1055/a-2760-4544 · Endoscopy International Open · 2026-02-02

## TL;DR

This study compares outcomes of a medical procedure for stomach blockage caused by cancer, finding similar success rates but more recurring symptoms in one group.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence that obstruction location does not impact clinical success or safety of EUS-GE in malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

## Key findings

- Clinical success rates were 94% for gastric obstruction and 87% for duodenal obstruction.
- Gastric obstruction was associated with more frequent recurrence of obstructive symptoms.
- Lumen-apposing metal stent dysfunction rates were similar between the two groups.

## Abstract

It is currently unclear whether obstruction location affects clinical and procedure outcomes after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Therefore, we compared clinical outcomes of EUS-GE for malignant GOO located in the stomach with obstruction located in the duodenum.

In this nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study, we included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-GE as palliative treatment for malignant GOO. Main outcomes were clinical success, serious adverse events (SAEs) recurrence of obstructive symptoms, and LAMS dysfunction.

Between 2018 and 2023, 298 patients underwent EUS-GE. Clinical success was achieved in 73 of 82 patients with a gastric obstruction (94%) and in 174 of 216 patients with a duodenal obstruction (87%). No association was found between location of obstruction and clinical success (odds ratio [OR] 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91 to 7.52,
P
= 0.073) or SAEs (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.20,
P
= 0.083). Recurrent obstructive symptoms occurred more frequently in patients with a gastric obstruction (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.77,
P
= 0.020). LAMS dysfunction did not differ between the groups (7 patients [9%] with a gastric obstruction and 11 patients [5%] with a duodenal obstruction).

In this study, EUS-GE in patients with a gastric obstruction had comparable technical and clinical efficacy and a similar safety profile to EUS-GE for duodenal obstruction. However, gastric obstruction was associated with recurrent symptoms of obstruction unrelated to LAMS dysfunction.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** GCG (glucagon) [NCBI Gene 2641] {aka GLP-1, GLP1, GLP2, GRPP}
- **Diseases:** nausea (MESH:D009325), Gastric cancer (MESH:D013274), bleeding (MESH:D006470), vomiting (MESH:D014839), stenosis (MESH:D003251), obstruction (MESH:D000402), linitis plastica (MESH:D008039), pancreatic cancer (MESH:D010190), LAMS (MESH:D013651), abdominal pain (MESH:D015746), peritoneal carcinomatosis (MESH:D010534), malignancies (MESH:D009369), intestinal obstruction (MESH:D007415), perforation (MESH:D057112), Gastric (MESH:D013272), nausea, vomiting (MESH:D020250), infectious (MESH:D003141), gastrojejunocolic fistula (MESH:D005402), hiatal hernia (MESH:D006551), terminally ill (MESH:D007153), Death (MESH:D003643), duodenal obstruction (MESH:D004380), ascites (MESH:D001201), obstructive symptoms (MESH:D012816), metastases (MESH:D009362), GOO (MESH:D017219), duodenal cancer (MESH:D004379)
- **Chemicals:** methylene blue (MESH:D008751), scopolamine butyl bromide (MESH:D002086), indigo carmine (MESH:D007203), AXIOS (-), glycopyrronium bromide (MESH:D006024)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951034/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951034/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951034/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12951034