# Atrial fibrillation ablation using three-dimensional artificial intelligence module integration with intracardiac echocardiography

## TL;DR

This study compares a new AI-based method for atrial fibrillation ablation with the standard technique, finding that the AI method reduces procedure time without compromising safety or effectiveness.

## Contribution

The study introduces and evaluates a novel AI module for automated left atrial reconstruction in AF ablation.

## Key findings

- AI FAM reduced total procedure time and left atrial dwell time compared to standard EAM.
- Acute procedural success and complication rates were similar between AI FAM and EAM.
- One-year freedom from AF recurrence was comparable between the two groups.

## Abstract

Intracardiac echocardiography-based electroanatomical mapping (EAM) improves procedural efficiency and safety in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and remains the standard of care. The CARTOSOUND FAM (AI FAM) module uses a deep-learning algorithm that automates left atrial reconstruction without manual contouring. This study aims to evaluate the 1-year outcomes of AI FAM compared to standard-of-care EAM in AF ablation.

This study included 298 patients undergoing radiofrequency AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients treated before January 2023 underwent standard-of-care EAM, while those in 2023 utilized AI FAM-based reconstruction. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, AF type, and medication use were recorded. Procedural characteristics, acute success, complications, and AF recurrence at 1-year follow-up were analysed. Of the 298 patients, 115 underwent mapping with AI FAM and 183 with EAM. Baseline characteristics were comparable. AI FAM reduced mean total procedure time (122.5 ± 23.5 vs. 129.0 ± 30.4 min, P = 0.040) and left atrial (LA) dwell time (78.3 ± 21.45 vs. 87.5 ± 28.2 min, P = 0.001). Acute procedural success was 98.3% in AI FAM vs. 98.9% in EAM with fewer complications observed in the AI FAM group (1 vs. 4). At 1 year, freedom from AF recurrence was comparable (80.0% AI FAM vs. 81.4% EAM at 1 year, LogRank P = 0.610).

AI FAM was associated with incremental but significant procedural advantages over conventional contouring via reduced total procedure time and LA dwell time, without compromising acute and long-term safety and rhythm control efficacy. AI FAM integration with pulsed field ablation will mark another step towards making AF ablation more streamlined and accessible.

Graphical AbstractFor image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.