# Culture sensitive care in oncology care settings in Jordan: a qualitative study

**Authors:** Omar Shamieh, Ghadeer Alarjeh, Waleed Alrjoub, Adib Edilbi, Ruba Al-Ani, Mousa Abdal-Rahman, Asem Mansour

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1747462 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2026-02-16

## TL;DR

This study explores how cultural beliefs and practices influence cancer care experiences in Jordan, emphasizing the need for culturally sensitive approaches.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into cultural dynamics affecting oncology care in Jordan through qualitative analysis of patient, caregiver, and provider perspectives.

## Key findings

- Cultural beliefs shape cancer perceptions, treatment choices, and care experiences in Jordan.
- Patients and caregivers prefer shared decision-making involving family and physicians, with some information withheld upon family request.
- Respect and clinical expertise are prioritized over provider gender, nationality, or religion in patient preferences.

## Abstract

Cultural beliefs significantly impact cancer perceptions, treatment choices, and care experiences. In Jordan, diverse patient background requires cultural competence and bias awareness among providers. This study aims to explore the cultural beliefs and practices of patients and their families in the experience of cancer care, and how these practices influence such care in Jordan.

This is a multi-center qualitative study used semi-structured face-to-face interviews with oncology healthcare providers, caregivers, and patients from three tertiary Jordanian hospitals providing cancer care. Purposive sampling was employed, and the interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo 12 software.

We conducted 108 face-to-face interviews with 35 patients, 37 caregivers, and 36 providers. Notably, 22% of patients and caregivers were non-Jordanian. Thematic analysis identified five major themes shared across both Jordanian and non-Jordanian participants: (1) Tradition and Rituals: Preferences varied around food, visitations and modifications to usual religious practices, (2) Cancer Conceptualization: While many viewed cancer as a divine test, others attributed it to genetics, poor nutrition, stress, or environmental factors such as pollution, (3) Advance Directives and information sharing: Participants preferred timely discussions on directives with preferences ranging from proactive to gradual disclosure. Shared decision-making was emphasized. Typically involving physicians, family members, and key figures, especially the patient spouse or eldest male relative. Some caregivers and providers reported withholding details from patients and children upon family’s request, (4) Psychosocial and practical concerns: Participants expressed worries about treatment side effects, disease progression, financial burden, and the future of patient’ children, and (5) Healthcare Provider’s Characteristics: Patients preferred respect, and clinical expertise over providers’ gender, nationality, or religion. However they favored same-gender nurses for daily care and those who could communicate in Arabic.

The study demonstrates how culturally embedded beliefs, family dynamics, and faith-based interpretations uniquely shape cancer care interactions in Jordan. Addressing these context-specific cultural factors is essential for strengthening culturally responsive communication and patient-centered oncology services in the region.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MONDO:0004992)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** emotional (MESH:D003072), gastrointestinal, breast, and lung cancers (MESH:D001943), loss of independence (MESH:D064129), fatigue (MESH:D005221), Cancer (MESH:D009369), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), anxiety (MESH:D001007), advanced (MESH:D020178), shock (MESH:D012769), trauma (MESH:D014947), death (MESH:D003643), pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Chemicals:** sugars (MESH:D000073893)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12950714/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12950714/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12950714/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12950714