# Clinically relevant radiation therapy doses and obturation techniques modulate the adhesive performance of a resin-based sealer: interfacial integrity and bond strength analyses

**Authors:** Mariana Travi Pandolfo, Luíz Carlos de Lima Dias-Júnior, Maria Eduarda Paz Dotto, Mariana Comparotto Minamisako, Paulo Marcelo Rodrigues, Nayara Cardoso Cábia, Bianca de Sousa Veiga, Maíra do Prado, Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00784-026-06800-3 · Clinical Oral Investigations · 2026-03-02

## TL;DR

This study shows that radiation therapy used in cancer treatment can weaken the bond of dental sealers in teeth, but certain filling techniques can help maintain their effectiveness.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that radiation therapy doses and obturation techniques significantly affect the adhesive performance of resin-based endodontic sealers.

## Key findings

- Radiation doses of 30 Gy and 70 Gy significantly reduced bond strength of the sealer compared to non-irradiated teeth.
- Tagger’s hybrid obturation technique produced higher bond strength than lateral condensation across all irradiation conditions.
- Higher radiation doses caused more severe interfacial degradation and reduced sealer penetration into dentin.

## Abstract

To evaluate the effects of clinically relevant radiation therapy doses and obturation techniques on the adhesive performance of a resin-based endodontic sealer.

Sixty human mandibular premolars were allocated to 3 groups according to radiation exposure: non-irradiated (NoRT), 30 Gy (clinically absorbed dose for mandibular premolars during nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy), and 70 Gy (tumor-target dose). Irradiation was performed using intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fractionated doses of 2 Gy. Root canals were prepared and obturated using lateral condensation (LC) or Tagger’s hybrid technique (HB) with an epoxy resin-based sealer. Push-out bond strength was evaluated in cervical, middle, and apical thirds. Failure modes were analyzed by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Sealer-dentin interface characteristics and sealer penetration were assessed using SEM and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test (α = 0.05).

Radiation dose significantly affected bond strength (P < .001), with both 30 Gy and 70 Gy groups showing reduced values compared with NoRT. HB demonstrated higher bond strength than LC across all irradiation conditions (P < .05). Root third had no significant effect (P > .05). SEM and CLSM analyses revealed interfacial degradation and reduced sealer penetration in both irradiated groups (30 Gy and 70 Gy), with more pronounced alterations observed at 70 Gy. Cohesive failure within the sealer occurred more frequently than mixed or adhesive failures across all experimental conditions.

Clinically absorbed and tumor-target radiation doses adversely affected the adhesive performance of the endodontic sealer to root dentin. Obturation technique remained a critical factor, with Tagger’s hybrid technique promoting improved sealer adaptation and penetration under all irradiation conditions.

Radiation therapy doses used in head and neck cancer treatment may impair the adhesion of endodontic sealers to root dentin. Selecting obturation techniques that enhance sealer adaptation and penetration may help optimize adhesive performance in teeth exposed to radiation therapy.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** nasopharyngeal cancer (MONDO:0015459)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (taxon 9606)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** dentin damage (MESH:D003805), LC (MESH:C565384), nasopharyngeal cancer (MESH:D009303), oral cavity cancer (MESH:D009062), osteoradionecrosis (MESH:D010025), HNC (MESH:D006258), trismus (MESH:D014313), calcifications (MESH:D002114), malignancy (MESH:D009369), fracture (MESH:D050723), NoRT (MESH:D012793), hyposalivation (MESH:D014987), mucositis (MESH:D052016), degradation (MESH:D055959), HB (MESH:D015456), dental damage (MESH:D009057), caries (MESH:D003731)
- **Chemicals:** ethyl alcohol (MESH:D000431), thymol (MESH:D013943), calcium phosphate (MESH:C020243), hydrochloric acid (MESH:D006851), alumina (MESH:D000537), sorbitol (MESH:D013012), water (MESH:D014867), palladium (MESH:D010165), apatite (MESH:D001031), carbon (MESH:D002244), calcium silicate (MESH:C031293), sodium benzoate (MESH:D020160), EDTA (MESH:D004492), AH Plus (MESH:C534916), magnesium chloride (MESH:D015636), gold (MESH:D006046), sodium chloride (MESH:D012965), Rhodamine B (MESH:C029773), NiTi (MESH:C040654), potassium chloride (MESH:D011189), glutaraldehyde (MESH:D005976), silicon carbide (MESH:C022088), sodium carboxymethylcellulose (MESH:D002266), NaOCl (MESH:D012973), Epoxy resin (MESH:D004853), sodium phosphate (MESH:C018279), ESPE (-), aluminum (MESH:D000535)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12950651/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12950651/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12950651