# Knowledge and Attitude Toward Interpregnancy Interval and Its Impact on Women’s Health

## TL;DR

This review examines how knowledge and attitudes about pregnancy spacing affect women's health, finding that short intervals increase risks while better awareness improves outcomes.

## Contribution

The paper highlights the interaction between knowledge, attitude, and pregnancy spacing as a novel focus for health interventions.

## Key findings

- Short interpregnancy intervals (<18 months) increase maternal anemia, postpartum complications, and depression risks by 15-45%.
- Women with positive attitudes and knowledge show higher contraceptive use (50%+) and better maternal health markers.
- Education and counseling are critical for improving pregnancy spacing and maternal well-being.

## Abstract

The interpregnancy interval, also known as pregnancy spacing, is one of the key factors influencing physical, mental, and reproductive health outcomes of women. According to the WHO, the minimum time interval between a live birth and succeeding conception is 24 months to minimize maternal and neonatal problems. Regardless of that, according to worldwide estimates, about 35-40% of pregnancies take place in intervals of less than 24 months, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This review employed a systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases for peer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2025, using keywords related to interpregnancy intervals and maternal outcomes. Studies were included if they provided quantitative data on maternal morbidity and were excluded if they focused exclusively on neonatal outcomes or lacked clear diagnostic criteria. The lack of knowledge and negative attitudes toward pregnancy spacing remain key contributors to closely spaced pregnancies. This review explores what women know and how they feel about space during pregnancy and determines its effect on the health of women. Based on the available literature, short periods of interpregnancy (less than 18 months) are linked to the risk of maternal anemia, postpartum complications, and postpartum depression, with rates increased by 30-45%, 20-25%, and 15-20%, respectively. On the other hand, women who are well-informed and optimistic about pregnancy spacing record increased contraceptive use (ranging 50% and above) and improved maternal health markers (6-7 on clinical scales). The knowledge/attitude/pregnancy spacing interaction is critical to producing successful health promotion interventions. Optimal birth spacing can be strengthened by enhancing the quality of education, counseling, and engagement of healthcare providers, which can result in better health and well-being for women.