# Coyotes Choose Cover Over Concrete When Selecting Den Sites

**Authors:** Summer Fink, Daniela Guerrero, Eden Nitza, Michel Kohl

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ece3.73186 · Ecology and Evolution · 2026-02-27

## TL;DR

Coyotes in Atlanta prefer den sites with natural cover over urban areas, showing adaptability in their reproductive decisions.

## Contribution

This study provides new insights into coyote den site selection in urban environments using GPS tracking and resource selection analysis.

## Key findings

- Approximately half of the dens were in anthropogenic structures, used for concealment and protection.
- Coyotes strongly selected cover habitats and avoided areas with high impervious surfaces.
- Findings suggest coyotes adapt to urbanization by choosing safer den sites to safeguard their young.

## Abstract

Animal decision‐making directly impacts survival and reproductive success, particularly for reproductive habitat specialists (e.g., denning species) in highly dynamic environments. Despite the widespread and increasing distribution of coyotes (
Canis latrans
) in urban areas, little research has focused on how they select urban den sites. In this study, we investigated den structure and site selection of coyotes in Atlanta, Georgia. From January to April of 2022–2024, we GPS collared 48 coyotes and located 20 dens in April of 2022–2025. We measured the physical characteristics of dens and categorized structure type as anthropogenic or natural. We used a 3rd‐order resource selection analysis to assess impacts of impervious surface (%), distance to buildings, and distance to cover habitat on den site selection. We found that approximately half of the dens were located in anthropogenic structures, which coyotes appeared to use opportunistically for concealment and protection. We also identified strong selection for cover habitat and avoidance of impervious surfaces by coyotes for den sites. Our findings indicate that coyotes in Atlanta avoid areas with high human infrastructure, select areas with cover, and show flexibility in structure use allowing them to safeguard dens. While this showcases the adaptability of coyotes when making complex reproductive decisions, it also highlights the potential population level impacts increased urbanization and land conversion may have on urban wildlife.

Reproductive decision‐making impacts fitness, especially in dynamic urban environments. Thus, we assessed urban coyote den site selection in Atlanta, GA. We found that coyotes made decision on both the site and structure of dens to mitigate fitness related risk and safeguard their young.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Canis latrans (taxon 9614)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tooth eruption (MESH:D014079), tooth wear (MESH:D057085)
- **Chemicals:** Opps (MESH:C402885), Silva (-)
- **Species:** Canis latrans (coyote, species) [taxon 9614], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Rangifer tarandus (caribou, species) [taxon 9870], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12949333/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12949333/full.md

## References

53 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12949333/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12949333