# Perceptions of assisted reproductive technologies in wildlife conservation: Public expectations and ethical implications across three EU countries

**Authors:** Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Thomas Hildebrandt, Steven Seet, Jan Stejskal, Paolo Giardullo, Frank Göritz, Susanne Holtze, Cesare Galli, Michal Šťastný, Barbara de Mori

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342094 · PLOS One · 2026-02-27

## TL;DR

This study explores public views on using assisted reproductive technologies in wildlife conservation across three EU countries, highlighting ethical concerns and the need for better communication.

## Contribution

The paper provides new insights into public perceptions and ethical implications of ART in wildlife conservation in three EU countries.

## Key findings

- Public support for ART in wildlife conservation varies across Czechia, Germany, and Italy.
- Ethical concerns, particularly regarding animal welfare, are prominent in public discourse.
- Improved communication is needed to foster public acceptance of ART in conservation.

## Abstract

This paper examines public perceptions of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in wildlife conservation across three European countries: Czechia, Germany, and Italy. In the context of ongoing biodiversity decline, ART can support conservation efforts by promoting population growth, facilitating genetic exchange, and enhancing genetic diversity through genome resource banks. However, the application of ART in wildlife conservation may challenge conventional views on reproduction and extinction and raise ethical considerations, for example concerning animal welfare. To assess public views and ethical concerns, we conducted a survey in three EU countries involved in the BioRescue project, a conservation initiative employing ART to prevent the extinction of the Northern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum cottoni). The survey explored respondents’ attitudes toward biodiversity loss, awareness of the rhinoceros crisis, support for ART in wildlife conservation, and their primary sources of environmental information. The findings inform recommendations for improving conservation communication and fostering public acceptance of ART in wildlife conservation, while emphasizing the need for rigorous ethical oversight to ensure their responsible application.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Ceratotherium simum cottoni (taxon 310713)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** rhino crisis (MESH:D015826), ART (MESH:C000719218)
- **Species:** Rhinocerotidae (rhinoceroses, family) [taxon 9803], Ceratotherium simum cottoni (northern square-lipped rhinoceros, subspecies) [taxon 310713], Dicerorhinus sumatrensis (Sumatran rhinoceros, species) [taxon 89632], Diceros bicornis (black rhinoceros, species) [taxon 9805], Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940], Neogale vison (American mink, species) [taxon 452646], Panthera leo (lion, species) [taxon 9689], Ursus arctos (brown bear, species) [taxon 9644], Capreolus capreolus (Western roe deer, species) [taxon 9858], Mustela lutreola (European mink, species) [taxon 9666], Rhinoceros sondaicus (Javan rhinoceros, species) [taxon 102233], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Rhinoceros unicornis (greater Indian rhinoceros, species) [taxon 9809], Monachus monachus (Mediterranean monk seal, species) [taxon 248254], Ceratotherium simum (square-lipped rhinoceros, species) [taxon 9807], Connochaetes gnou (black wildebeest, species) [taxon 59528]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12948088/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12948088/full.md

## References

65 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12948088/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12948088