# Which Systematic Review Software Works Best? A Practical Comparison

**Authors:** Juan José Serrano Silva, Sandra Fernández, Nicolás Rosillo, Héctor Bueno

PMC · DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2026.2262 · Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026-02-17

## TL;DR

This paper compares different systematic review software tools to determine which ones work best for users.

## Contribution

The study provides a practical comparison of systematic review software, highlighting their features and pricing models.

## Key findings

- Covidence, Rayyan, EPPI Centre, Distiller SR, and RevMan are popular systematic review tools.
- Each tool has distinct pricing models, such as pay per review or pay per user.
- The paper presents contact and website details for each software provider.

## Abstract

Covidence. Covidence Pty Ltd, Level 10, 446 Collins ST, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia; support@covidence.org; https://www.covidence.org/; pay per review.

Rayyan. Rayyan, 1 Broadway, 14th Floor Cambridge, MA, 02142 USA; https://www.rayyan.ai/; pay per user.

EPPI Centre. EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Social Research Institute, 10 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0NS; eppisupport@ucl.ac.uk; https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/; pay per user.

Distiller SR. DistillerSR Inc, 505 March Road, Suite 450, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K2K 3A4; support@distillersr.com; https://www.distillersr.com/; contact for pricing.

RevMan. The Cochrane Collaboration, 11-13 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0AN, United Kingdom; https://revman.cochrane.org/info; pay per user.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947929/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947929/full.md

## References

9 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947929/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947929