# Is injectable platelet rich fibrin beneficial in managing intracapsular temporomandibular disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Mariam M. Bahgat, Nourhan M. Aly

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-07331-1 · BMC Oral Health · 2025-12-09

## TL;DR

This study reviews evidence on whether injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) helps treat temporomandibular joint disorders, finding it may reduce pain and improve jaw movement, though more research is needed.

## Contribution

The paper provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of i-PRF's effectiveness in managing intracapsular temporomandibular disorders.

## Key findings

- i-PRF significantly reduces pain levels in TMJ disorders compared to controls.
- i-PRF improves maximum mouth opening and lateral mandibular movements.
- Improvements in joint sounds and disc position were reported in some studies.

## Abstract

To highlight the current knowledge of the effectiveness of injectable platelet rich fibrin (i-PRF) in the management of temporomandibular joint internal derangement (TMJ-ID) and temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA).

A “Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome” (PICO) strategy was implemented by performing a systematic search through Cochrane databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar from their commencement to November 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) addressing the management of TMJ-ID and TMJ-OA with i-PRF were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated the suitability of the RCTs, followed by data extraction.

The electronic search revealed 274 articles, but only 6 studies were deemed suitable for selection, with a total of 270 subjects; 75% were females, and 25% were males. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in pain levels with i-PRF compared to controls (pooled SMD = − 2.16; 95% CI = − 3.43 to − 0.89; P < 0.001). Significant improvement was also observed in maximum mouth opening (SMD = 2.46; 95% CI = 0.56 to 4.36; P = 0.02). i-PRF significantly enhanced lateral mandibular movements compared with controls (SMD = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.03 to 2.67; P = 0.048), whereas no significant difference was found for protrusive movements (SMD = 1.76; 95% CI = − 0.97 to 4.48; P = 0.11). Improvements in joint sounds and disc position were qualitatively reported in smaller subsets of studies. Substantial heterogeneity (I² = 83–93%) was observed across outcomes, reflecting variability in study design and treatment protocols.

Current evidence suggests that i-PRF provides improvements in TMJ pain, joint sounds, and mandibular movements for up to 12 months. However, more RCTs are needed.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146), TMJ pain (MESH:D013706), temporomandibular disorders (MESH:D013705)
- **Chemicals:** i (MESH:D007455)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947513/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947513/full.md

## References

3 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947513/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947513