# Physiological Advantages of a Fiber-Enriched Plant-Based Dessert: Improved Glycemic Control and Appetite Regulation over a Commercial Dairy Product

**Authors:** Maria Tereza Lucena Pereira, Andréa Cardoso de Aquino, Chiara Porro, Socorro Vanesca Frota Gaban

PMC · DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.5c10700 · ACS Omega · 2026-02-10

## TL;DR

A plant-based dessert made with chickpeas, quinoa, and sweet potatoes had better blood sugar control and increased feelings of fullness compared to a dairy dessert.

## Contribution

The study introduces a plant-based dessert with physiological benefits over a commercial dairy dessert.

## Key findings

- The plant-based dessert had a significantly lower glycemic impact and glycemic load than the dairy dessert.
- It increased satiety and fullness while reducing hunger and prospective food consumption.
- The plant-based dessert had lower energy density, fat, and added sugars per 100 g.

## Abstract

This study investigated
the glycemic response and subjective
appetite
sensations elicited by a research prototype of a plant-based cocoa
dessert, formulated with chickpeas, quinoa, sweet potatoes, and brown
rice, and compared it with a commercial dairy dessert. Eleven participants
(mean age = 27.0 ± 7.91 years; BMI = 24.11 ± 3.35 kg/m2) consumed portions containing 50 g of available carbohydrates
in a randomized crossover design. Capillary blood glucose was measured
at fasting and at 15–120 min postprandially. The incremental
area under the curve (iAUC) was significantly lower for the plant-based
dessert compared with the commercial dairy dessert (13003 ± 466
vs 13492 ± 492 mg·min/dL; p = 0.0021).
At 15 min, postprandial glucose for the plant-based dessert was significantly
lower than that for the dairy dessert (p < 0.05).
Both desserts presented high glycemic index values (80.22 ± 44.00
vs 83.23 ± 46.78), but the plant-based dessert exhibited a lower
glycemic load (16.60 vs 18.31). Subjective appetite analyses showed
that the plant-based dessert produced significantly greater satiety
at 90 and 120 min (p < 0.05) and higher fullness
scores at 60, 90, and 120 min (p < 0.05) than
the commercial dairy dessert. Conversely, hunger and prospective food
consumption scores were significantly lower after the plant-based
dessert at the same time points (p < 0.05). Appetite-specific
sensations were also modulated, with significantly higher scores for
salty and tasty hunger were observed after consumption of the plant-based
dessert (p < 0.05). Both the plant-based and commercial
dairy desserts exhibited inverse correlations between glycemia and
hunger (r = −0.93, p = 0.0017; r = −0.92, p = 0.0032) and prospective
food consumption (r = −0.96, p = 0.0004; r = −0.98, p <
0.0001), whereas satiety (r = 0.93, p = 0.0019; r = 0.95, p = 0.0007)
and fullness (r = 0.91, p = 0.0009; r = 0.95, p = 0.0008) were positively correlated
with glycemia, respectively. Per 100 g, the plant-based dessert had
lower energy density, fat, and added sugars than the commercial dairy
dessert. Overall, the plant-based cocoa dessert elicited a more favorable
physiological profile, combining attenuated glycemic impact, moderate
glycemic load, and enhanced satiety, supporting its potential as a
nutritionally improved, functional alternative for the development
of health-oriented dessert formulations.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** inflammatory (MESH:D007249), diabetes (MESH:D003920), prediabetes (MESH:D011236), obese (MESH:D009765), NCDs (MESH:D000073296), overweight (MESH:D050177), metabolic disorders (MESH:D008659), impaired glucose regulation (MESH:C565631), lactose intolerance (MESH:D007787), impaired fasting glucose (MESH:D007003), metabolic or gastrointestinal disorders (MESH:D005767), insulin resistance (MESH:D007333), food allergies (MESH:D005512), type 2 diabetes (MESH:D003924), adiposity (MESH:D018205), impaired glucose tolerance (MESH:D018149)
- **Chemicals:** fat (MESH:D005223), maltodextrin (MESH:C008315), salt (MESH:D012492), sugar (MESH:D000073893), fiber (MESH:D004043), methylxanthines (MESH:C008514), lactose (MESH:D007785), polysaccharides (MESH:D011134), simple sugars (MESH:D009005), amylopectin (MESH:D000687), water (MESH:D014867), Blood Glucose (MESH:D001786), polydextrose (MESH:C033375), Cocoa Dessert (-), appetite-regulating hormones (MESH:D054439), amino acids (MESH:D000596), proanthocyanidins (MESH:D044945), starch (MESH:D013213), Carbohydrates (MESH:D002241), polyphenols (MESH:D059808), sucrose (MESH:D013395), lipid (MESH:D008055), alcohol (MESH:D000438), Glucose (MESH:D005947)
- **Species:** Cicer arietinum (chickpea, species) [taxon 3827], Theobroma cacao (cacao, species) [taxon 3641], Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa, species) [taxon 63459], Ipomoea batatas (batate, species) [taxon 4120], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Oryza sativa (Asian cultivated rice, species) [taxon 4530]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947189/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947189/full.md

## References

52 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947189/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12947189