# Substantially lower estimates in China’s offshore wind potential using farm-scale spatial modeling and wake effects

## TL;DR

This study finds China's offshore wind potential is lower than previously thought due to realistic modeling of wind farms and wake effects.

## Contribution

The study introduces farm-scale spatial modeling and wake effects to provide a more accurate assessment of China’s offshore wind potential.

## Key findings

- China’s offshore wind potential is estimated at 2.5–4.2 PWh yr−1, significantly lower than previous estimates.
- Wake losses within wind farms are higher than previously assumed.
- Deep-water floating wind farms have higher potential density but higher costs compared to nearshore farms.

## Abstract

Renewable energy is critical for addressing global climate change, and accurate assessments of its potential are key for decision making and planning. This study provides a detailed, farm-level evaluation of offshore wind power potential in China, incorporating realistic turbine layouts derived from remote sensing data, wake loss modeling, and future climate scenarios. Our findings show that accounting for the farm-level details results in a China’s offshore wind potential of 2.5–4.2 PWh yr−1 which is significantly lower than previous estimates, which often exceeded 5.6 PWh yr−1. Through modeling the wake loss effects within wind farms, the study reveals that wake losses are higher than previously assumed in earlier research. Additionally, the study highlights substantial economic and technical disparities between nearshore bottom-fixed and deep-water floating wind farms, with the latter offering higher potential density but at greater costs. Our results provide a more realistic foundation for setting energy targets, optimizing regional strategies, and promoting floating wind technologies to harness deep-water resources, thereby supporting China’s transition to a sustainable energy future.

The study evaluates China’s offshore wind potential using farm-scale modeling, revealing lower potential than previous estimates. It incorporates realistic turbine layouts, wake loss modeling, and climate scenarios, highlighting economic and technical differences between nearshore and deep-water wind farms.