# An Industry Perspective on Compassionate Use in Europe: A Call for Change

**Authors:** Philipp Schlatter, Nina Heiss, Pedro Franco, Annie O’Keefe Martin, Susan Robson, Ramona Reichenbach

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s43441-025-00902-y · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · 2025-12-15

## TL;DR

This paper highlights inconsistencies in compassionate use access across European countries and calls for regulatory harmonization to improve patient access to unapproved medicines.

## Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence on operational challenges in compassionate use across Europe and advocates for policy changes to reduce variability.

## Key findings

- Internal company approval times for compassionate use were consistent across countries, with a median of 5 days.
- Differences in national requirements caused variability in shipment times and operational challenges for stakeholders.
- The study identified terminology and regulatory inconsistencies as major barriers to harmonized compassionate use implementation.

## Abstract

Options for patients to receive unauthorised medicines through compassionate use (CU) in Europe vary greatly. There are two CU pathways: cohort programmes, regulated uniformly by the Regulation across EU member states, and individual patient requests (IPRs) governed by the Directive. The latter allows member states to determine their own laws, resulting in heterogeneous regulatory requirements and challenges in operationalization. Consequently, patients may experience delays in accessing CU medicines depending on their country of residence. To compare CU availability across European countries and formulate recommendations for improvement, we analyzed 8,934 patient requests from 30 European countries.

An exploratory post-hoc analysis was conducted using pooled collaborative data from 8,934 patient requests provided by Merck KGaA, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi, tracked from January 1, 2020 to April 30, 2023 across 30 countries. All requests with complete dates for submission, company approval, relevant Ethics Committees or Health Authorities, and shipment dates were included.

While internal company CU approval steps were found to be similar with a median approval time of 5 days (median interquartile range (IQR) of 1 (0–6) for cohorts; median IQR 4 (1–8) for IPRs), the time from company approval until shipment varied between cohort requests (median IQR 5 (1–16) days) and IPRs (median IQR 8 (1–22) days). Challenges experienced included differences in the use of CU terminologies, scope, settings, regulatory, and operational requirements.

Our findings indicate that differing national requirements across Europe lead to operational challenges and inter-country variability in CU implementation posing operational challenges for stakeholders, highlighting the need for improved harmonization.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946237/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946237/full.md

## References

6 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946237/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946237