# The impact of artificial intelligence perception on university students' academic engagement: the mediating role of academic motivation and the moderating role of academic self-efficacy

**Authors:** Yantao Shi, Haiyan Cui, Yuanchang Zhang, Xueli Hui, Guanghai Li, Mingkun Ouyang, Lingle Pan

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1735410 · Frontiers in Psychology · 2026-02-13

## TL;DR

This study explores how university students' views on AI affect their academic engagement, with motivation and self-efficacy playing key roles.

## Contribution

The study identifies academic motivation as a mediator and academic self-efficacy as a moderator in the relationship between AI perception and academic engagement.

## Key findings

- AI perception was negatively associated with academic engagement.
- Academic motivation partially mediated the relationship between AI perception and engagement.
- Academic self-efficacy moderated both the direct and indirect associations.

## Abstract

To test whether academic motivation mediates the association between artificial intelligence (AI) perception and university students' academic engagement, and whether academic self-efficacy moderates the direct and indirect associations.

Cross-sectional, single-wave, self-administered questionnaire survey; all variables were assessed once at a single time point in a convenience sample of university students in Anhui, China.

A convenience sample of 1,484 university students in Anhui Province completed an anonymous questionnaire measuring AI perception, academic engagement, academic motivation, and academic self-efficacy. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression-based mediation and moderated mediation analyses were conducted.

AI-related perceptions were negatively associated with academic engagement, and academic motivation partially mediated this association. Academic self-efficacy moderated both the direct association and the indirect pathway via motivation: when self-efficacy was lower, the negative association between AI-related perceptions and engagement was stronger and the motivation–engagement association was weaker; when self-efficacy was higher, the opposite pattern emerged, and the indirect effect via motivation was stronger.

AI-related perceptions were inversely associated with academic engagement partly through academic motivation, and these associations varied by academic self-efficacy. Given the cross-sectional, self-report design, the findings are correlational and require longitudinal or experimental verification.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), burnout (MESH:D002055), difficulty concentrating (MESH:C567712), AI (MESH:C538142)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946146/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946146/full.md

## References

103 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946146/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12946146