# Safety Comparison of Risk of Liver Dysfunction between Generic and Brand Statin Drugs Marketed in Japan: A Cohort Study Using MID-NET®

**Authors:** Hotaka Maruyama, Yuki Kinoshita, Takashi Ando, Jun Okui, Maki Komamine, Kazuhiro Kajiyama, Naoya Horiuchi, Yoshiaki Uyama

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s43441-025-00904-w · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · 2025-12-27

## TL;DR

This study compares the risk of liver dysfunction between generic and brand statin drugs in Japan, finding similar safety profiles except for atorvastatin.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence on the safety of generic statins compared to brand drugs using a large database in Japan.

## Key findings

- Generic statins showed similar risks of liver dysfunction as brand drugs, except for atorvastatin.
- The increased risk for generic atorvastatin may be influenced by other factors and not a true safety difference.
- Shorter follow-up periods showed decreasing hazard ratios for atorvastatin, approaching those of brand drugs.

## Abstract

To verify safety profiles of generic statins in a real-world setting, the risk of liver dysfunction as a common adverse event was compared between generic and brand drugs. A new user cohort design was employed in which patients prescribed one of six statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, or rosuvastatin) in Japan between January 1, 2014 and March 31, 2022 were identified in the MID-NET® database. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for generic drugs compared with their corresponding brand drug for the occurrence of first liver dysfunction were estimated using high-dimensional propensity score-weighted Cox models. Among the six statins, no increased trends in aHRs were observed in the primary analysis, except for atorvastatin. The primary analysis showed an aHR of 2.08 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–3.63) for atorvastatin. In an additional analysis with shorter follow-up periods, aHRs for atorvastatin gradually approached 1.00 (1.74 [95% CI: 0.94–3.22] within 360 days, 1.65 [95% CI: 0.84–3.25] within 180 days, 1.49 [95% CI: 0.73–3.01] within 90 days, and 1.33 [95% CI: 0.60–2.96] within 30 days). Results suggest that risks of liver dysfunction by generic statins are similar to those for brand drugs, facilitating our understanding about the safety of generic drugs. The aHR for atorvastatin was inconsistent between the primary and additional analyses, which suggests that the observed increased risk of generic atorvastatin may be affected by other factors and does not necessarily indicate a different safety profile between generic and brand drugs.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43441-025-00904-w.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** atorvastatin (PubChem CID 60823), simvastatin (PubChem CID 54454), pitavastatin (PubChem CID 5282452), pravastatin (PubChem CID 54687), fluvastatin (PubChem CID 446155), rosuvastatin (PubChem CID 446157)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Liver Dysfunction (MESH:D017093)
- **Chemicals:** pravastatin (MESH:D017035), fluvastatin (MESH:D000077340), simvastatin (MESH:D019821), pitavastatin (MESH:C108475), rosuvastatin (MESH:D000068718), atorvastatin (MESH:D000069059)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12945947/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12945947/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12945947/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12945947