# Quantitative evaluation of China’s artificial intelligence policies: A PMC index-based modeling approach

**Authors:** Xia Liu, Xuan Zhuang, Hongfeng Zhang, Han Zhang, Yuli Wang, Juntao Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335423 · PLOS One · 2026-02-26

## TL;DR

This study evaluates China's AI policies using a quantitative model and compares them to those of developed countries, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel PMC index-based framework for quantitatively evaluating AI policies and provides cross-national insights.

## Key findings

- China's AI policies have successfully promoted technological innovation and industrial development.
- Shortcomings in legal protection and ethical regulation were identified in China's AI policies.
- Policy design and implementation differ between China and developed countries in Europe and the United States.

## Abstract

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), various countries have introduced policies to address the social, economic, and ethical challenges brought by technological advancements. This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness of China’s AI policies based on the Policy Model Consistency (PMC) method and conducts a comparative analysis with policies from developed countries in Europe and the United States. By constructing a multi-dimensional quantitative assessment system that encompasses indicators such as policy types, timeliness, content, fields, evaluation, tools, and effectiveness levels, this study fills a gap in the existing research on quantitative evaluation. Text mining and high-frequency word analysis revealed the core themes and focus areas of the policies, laying the groundwork for subsequent quantitative analysis. The study finds that China’s AI policies have achieved significant results in promoting technological innovation, industrial development, and social transformation; however, shortcomings remain in legal protection, ethical regulation, cross-domain collaboration, and sustainable development issues. Further cross-national comparisons indicate that there are differences between China and developed countries in Europe and the United States in terms of AI policy design and implementation, particularly regarding the application of policy tools and the driving forces behind international collaboration. Based on the empirical analysis results using the PMC index model, this study proposes targeted policy optimization suggestions aimed at enhancing policy execution and adaptability. This study not only provides an innovative framework for the quantitative evaluation of AI policies but also offers theoretical support for the collaborative development of global AI policies.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** depression (MESH:D003866), AI (MESH:C538142), PMC (MESH:D004195)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12944790/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12944790/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12944790/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12944790