# Predictive modeling of sugar beet bolting via vernalization-intensity model and resilience assessment in diverse autumn cultivation environments

## TL;DR

This study identifies sugar beet genotypes suitable for autumn planting that reduce irrigation needs and minimize bolting risks under changing climate conditions.

## Contribution

A vernalization-intensity model and stability analysis were used to identify high-performing, bolting-resistant sugar beet genotypes for autumn cultivation.

## Key findings

- Genotypes BOL435 and BOL434 showed high vernalization thresholds and low bolting sensitivity, making them suitable for fluctuating winter conditions.
- WAASB-based stability analysis identified BOL375, BOL239, BOL376, and BOL068 as stable, high-performing genotypes for white sugar yield.
- Multi-trait stability index analysis highlighted BOL434, BOL376, and BOL239 as the most stable genotypes across agronomic and qualitative traits.

## Abstract

Climate change and increasing pressure on water resources have renewed interest in autumn cultivation of sugar beet, a practice that benefits from seasonal precipitation and reduces dependence on irrigation. However, bolting remains a major limitation, substantially affecting yield stability and the economic viability of production. This study evaluated ten experimental sugar beet hybrids and two bolting-resistant control varieties across three environments over two cropping years (2022–2023 and 2023–2024). Randomized complete block design with four replications was implemented for agronomic evaluations. The vernalization–intensity model was used to estimate vernalization threshold (VT) and bolting sensitivity. Genotype BOL436 exhibited the highest VT (134 h) but also showed pronounced sensitivity to bolting. In contrast, genotypes BOL435 and BOL434, with similarly high VT values, displayed low bolting sensitivity and thus greater suitability for fluctuating winter conditions. Combined ANOVA revealed significant genotype and environment effects (P < 0.01) for all measured traits, while genotype–environment interaction (GEI) significantly influenced white sugar yield (WSY) and root yield (RY). Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) analysis indicated that the first two interaction principal components (IPCs) accounted for 75.20% of GEI variation in WSY, whereas IPC1 alone explained 57.60% for RY. WAASB-based stability analysis identified BOL375, BOL239, BOL376, and BOL068 as stable, high-performing genotypes for WSY, with BOL239, BOL375, BOL068, and BOL435 showing comparable superiority for RY. Results from the WAASBY index were consistent with these findings. Multi-trait stability index (MTSI) analysis further highlighted BOL434, BOL376, and BOL239 as the most stable genotypes across agronomic and qualitative traits. Overall, the results demonstrate that autumn cultivation, supported by robust modeling and stability analysis, can contribute to reduced irrigation needs, while the identified genotypes offer promising options for enhancing productivity and minimizing bolting risk in water-limited environments.