# Advancing Balance Assessment in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparative Exploration of Sensor-Based and Conventional Balance Tests

## TL;DR

This study compares sensor-based and traditional balance tests for stroke patients, finding that sensors provide unique balance data but do not replace conventional methods.

## Contribution

The study introduces IMU-based postural sway measures as a complementary tool for balance assessment in stroke rehabilitation.

## Key findings

- IMU-based postural sway measures avoid floor and ceiling effects, making them suitable for tracking balance progression.
- IMU stance-tasks correlated moderately with BBS and Mini-BESTest, but sitting-tasks showed weak or no correlation with the TCT.
- IMUs capture balance information distinct from conventional tests, suggesting a complementary rather than replacement role.

## Abstract

What are the main findings?
Postural sway measures are less prone to floor and ceiling effects and may be well suited for monitoring balance progression in the future.Postural sway measurement provides complementary balance information: IMU stance-tasks correlated moderately with the BBS and Mini-BESTest, while IMU sitting-tasks showed weak to no association with the TCT.

Postural sway measures are less prone to floor and ceiling effects and may be well suited for monitoring balance progression in the future.

Postural sway measurement provides complementary balance information: IMU stance-tasks correlated moderately with the BBS and Mini-BESTest, while IMU sitting-tasks showed weak to no association with the TCT.

What are the implications of the main findings?
IMUs capture balance information that is partially distinct from conventional tests and therefore cannot replace conventional balance tests.The clinical value of postural sway measurement in clinical stroke rehabilitation requires further investigation.

IMUs capture balance information that is partially distinct from conventional tests and therefore cannot replace conventional balance tests.

The clinical value of postural sway measurement in clinical stroke rehabilitation requires further investigation.

Balance impairments in stroke rehabilitation are commonly assessed using the Trunk Control Test (TCT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Mini Balance Evaluation System Test (Mini-BESTest). However, these conventional tests are subjective, susceptible to floor and ceiling effects, and time-intensive. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) may address these limitations by providing objective, impairment-level metrics, not captured by conventional tests. This observational study explored the measurement properties of an IMU-based balance assessment of postural sway, and compared them with conventional tests in routine stroke rehabilitation. Stroke survivors from five Dutch rehabilitation centers were assessed at admission and discharge using conventional and IMU-based balance tests during sitting and standing tasks. Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated, and relationships between measures were examined using correlation analysis. At admission, 105 participants were measured, and 90 at discharge. IMU measures showed no floor or ceiling effects despite skewed distributions. IMU stance-tasks correlated moderately with the BBS and Mini-BESTest (18–29% variance explained), whereas IMU sitting-tasks showed weak to no relationship with the TCT. IMU-based balance assessment of postural sway captures balance-related information that is partially different from conventional tests. Although IMUs offer practical advantages, further research is needed to establish the clinical relevance of postural sway measurements alongside conventional tests.