# Two-Stage Wildlife Event Classification for Edge Deployment

**Authors:** Aditya S. Viswanathan, Adis Bock, Zoe Bent, Mark A. Peyton, Daniel M. Tartakovsky, Javier E. Santos

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s26041366 · 2026-02-21

## TL;DR

A two-stage edge system quickly and accurately identifies pumas in wildlife camera images, reducing false alarms and enabling timely interventions.

## Contribution

A deployable edge sensor using a two-stage vision pipeline for real-time wildlife classification in low-quality and offline settings.

## Key findings

- The two-stage system achieves high precision (0.983) and recall (0.975) in puma detection.
- The system reduces false alarms compared to full-image classifiers while maintaining high accuracy.
- The design is robust to low-quality nighttime imagery and operates with minimal latency (4 seconds).

## Abstract

Camera-based wildlife monitoring is often overwhelmed by non-target triggers and slowed by manual review or cloud-dependent inference, which can prevent timely intervention for high stakes human–wildlife conflicts. Our key contribution is a deployable, fully offline edge vision sensor that achieves near-real-time, highly accurate wildlife event classification by combining detector-based empty-image suppression with a lightweight classifier trained with a staged transfer-learning curriculum. Specifically, Stage 1 uses a pretrained You Only Look Once (YOLO)-family detector for permissive animal localization and empty-trigger suppression, and Stage 2 uses a lightweight EfficientNet-based binary classifier to confirm puma on detector crops and gate downstream actions. Our design is robust to low-quality nighttime monochrome imagery (motion blur, low contrast, illumination artifacts, and partial-body captures) and operates using commercially available components in connectivity-limited settings. In field deployments running since May 2025, end-to-end latency from camera trigger to action command is approximately 4 s. Ablation studies using a dataset of labeled wildlife images (pumas, not pumas) show that the two-stage approach substantially reduces false alarms in identifying pumas relative to a full-image classifier while maintaining high recall. On the held-out test set (N=1434 events), the proposed two-stage cascade achieves precision 0.983, recall 0.975, F1 0.979, accuracy 0.986, and balanced accuracy 0.983, with only 8 false positives and 12 false negatives. The system can be easily adapted for other species, as demonstrated by rapid retraining of the second stage to classify ringtails. Downstream responses (e.g., notifications and optional audio/light outputs) provide flexible actuation capabilities that can be configured to support intervention.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** injury to (MESH:D014947)
- **Chemicals:** YOLO (-)
- **Species:** Bassariscus astutus (ringtail, species) [taxon 55047], Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940], Puma (genus) [taxon 146712], Canis latrans (coyote, species) [taxon 9614], Procyon lotor (northern raccoon, species) [taxon 9654], Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615], Mephitidae (skunks, family) [taxon 119825], Ursidae (bears, family) [taxon 9632], Ursus maritimus (polar bear, species) [taxon 29073], Equus caballus (domestic horse, species) [taxon 9796], Felis catus (cat, species) [taxon 9685], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Lynx rufus (bobcat, species) [taxon 61384]

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12944408/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12944408