# Adverse Impact of Gamma-Polyglutamic Acid on the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Cefiderocol and Nanosilver Against Gram-Negative Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii

**Authors:** Żaneta Binert-Kusztal, Agata Krakowska, Iwona Skiba-Kurek, Przemysław Dorożyński, Tomasz Skalski

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020157 · 2026-01-25

## TL;DR

Gamma-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA) reduces the effectiveness of antibiotics and silver nanoparticles against drug-resistant bacteria in wound dressings, despite promoting healing.

## Contribution

This study reveals γ-PGA's paradoxical role in wound dressings by protecting bacteria from antimicrobial agents while supporting tissue healing.

## Key findings

- γ-PGA concentration was the main factor influencing bacterial survival, with high levels stabilizing viability at around 40%.
- Direct contact between γ-PGA and bacteria enhanced persistence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.
- Cefiderocol and silver nanoparticles showed antimicrobial activity, but γ-PGA reduced their efficacy.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Wound infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, pose a major clinical challenge. This study evaluated the interactions between gamma-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA), cefiderocol, and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) within multilayer wound dressing configurations. The primary goal was to clarify the dual role of γ-PGA as a healing promoter and a potential protector of bacterial cells against antimicrobial agents. Methods: Multilayer dressing models were assembled in 96-well plates to simulate vertical stratification of antimicrobial layers4. Bacterial viability was assessed through relative OD600 measurements following incubation with varying concentrations and spatial arrangements of cefiderocol, AgNPs, and γ-PGA. Data were analyzed using generalized linear modeling (GLM) with a gamma distribution and random forest regression to determine the relative importance of each factor in modulating bacterial survival. Results: γ-PGA concentration emerged as the dominant factor influencing bacterial viability, accounting for nearly 100% of variable importance in random forest analysis. Despite high antimicrobial pressure from cefiderocol and AgNPs, bacterial viability stabilized at approximately 40% in the presence of γ-PGA. The vertical positioning of γ-PGA significantly impacted survival; direct physical contact between the polymer and bacteria, particularly at high concentrations, enhanced bacterial persistence in P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Cefiderocol showed strain-specific potency, while AgNPs provided consistent growth inhibition. Conclusions: γ-PGA plays a paradoxical role in wound care by providing moisture retention while simultaneously acting as a cytoprotective agent that reduces antimicrobial efficacy, likely by facilitating biofilm formation. These findings underscore the necessity of optimizing the spatial layering and concentration of biopolymers in advanced dressings. Strategic design is crucial to balance regenerative benefits with maximal antimicrobial control to improve clinical outcomes in chronic wound management.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** cefiderocol (PubChem CID 77843966)
- **Species:** Escherichia coli (taxon 562), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (taxon 287), Acinetobacter baumannii (taxon 470)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** beta-lactamase [NCBI Gene 4290808]
- **Diseases:** Wound infections (MESH:D014946), cytotoxicity (MESH:D064420), infection (MESH:D007239), injury to (MESH:D014947), systemic infection (MESH:D012141), inflammation (MESH:D007249)
- **Chemicals:** P1 (MESH:C480041), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MESH:D008278), sodium glutamate (MESH:D012970), cephalosporin (MESH:D002511), AA (-), Glucose (MESH:D005947), DMSO (MESH:D004121), alcohol (MESH:D000438), Ag(I) (MESH:C030584), LPS (MESH:D008070), sucrose (MESH:D013395), carbon (MESH:D002244), polymer (MESH:D011108), Poly-beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosamine (MESH:C505465), AgNO3 (MESH:D012835), NH4Cl (MESH:D000643), K2HPO4 (MESH:C013216), nitrogen (MESH:D009584), Cefiderocol (MESH:C000612166), alginate (MESH:D000464), sodium chloride (MESH:D012965), Metal (MESH:D008670), Gamma-Polyglutamic Acid (MESH:C511775), sodium hydroxide (MESH:D012972), ethanol (MESH:D000431), lipid A (MESH:D008050), L-ascorbic acid (MESH:D001205), isopropanol (MESH:D019840), Silver (MESH:D012834), iron (MESH:D007501), methylene blue (MESH:D008751), water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Acinetobacter baumannii (species) [taxon 470], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932], Klebsiella pneumoniae (species) [taxon 573], Pseudomonas aeruginosa (species) [taxon 287], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Bacillus subtilis (species) [taxon 1423]
- **Cell lines:** HaCaT — Homo sapiens (Human), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_0038), MH-II broth — Mus musculus (Mouse), Hybridoma (CVCL_J223)

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943851/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943851