Predicting Mortality in Pulmonary Embolism: A Machine Learning Approach with External Validation in COVID-19 Patients
Diana Alexandra Mîțu, Alexandru Cristian Cindrea, Alexandra Maria Borita, Adina Maria Marza, Corneluța Fira-Mladinescu, Madalin-Marius Margan, Alexandra Herlo, Alina Petrica, Gabriel-Aurel Rus, Daniel-Florin Lighezan, Flavia Zara, Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle

TL;DR
This study uses machine learning to predict mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism, finding that models work better in non-COVID patients and worse in those with COVID-19.
Contribution
The study introduces machine learning models for predicting mortality in pulmonary embolism and validates their performance in both non-COVID and COVID-19 patients.
Findings
Machine learning models outperformed PESI in predicting mortality for non-COVID pulmonary embolism patients.
Model performance significantly declined when applied to patients with concomitant COVID-19.
Sepsis, PESI class V, and biomarkers like NT-proBNP were strongly associated with mortality.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent thrombotic complication associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and is linked to significant early mortality. Accurate early risk stratification in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging, and it is unclear how well commonly used PE prognostic tools perform in patients with concomitant COVID-19. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study including 538 consecutive patients with acute PE and with or without confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted through the ED. Univariate analysis and machine learning models were employed to assess mortality risk. Results: In univariate analysis, mortality was strongly associated with sepsis (OR 11.68) and PESI class V (OR 5.56) and was also linked to higher neutrophil count (OR 1.19), platelet count (OR 1.12), and NT-proBNP (OR 1.20). In the non-COVID…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
