Hospital Surgical Volume and Regional Disparities in Congenital Heart Surgery Outcomes: Analysis of Korean National Health Insurance Claims Data, 2002–2021
Ji-Sook Kim, Hyeong-taek Woo, Jong-Yeon Kim, Hang-Me Nam, Hye-Jin Lee

TL;DR
Congenital heart surgery outcomes in Korea are strongly linked to hospital surgical volume, with low-volume hospitals having higher mortality rates, and regional disparities largely explained by uneven distribution of surgeries.
Contribution
This study provides nationwide evidence in Korea of a strong volume–outcome relationship in congenital heart surgery and identifies surgical volume as a key driver of regional disparities.
Findings
Low-volume hospitals had significantly higher 30-day mortality rates compared to high-volume hospitals.
Adjusting for surgical volume reduced the regional disparity in outcomes between Seoul Capital Area and non-SCA hospitals.
Surgical volume accounted for 54% of the variation in 30-day mortality between hospitals.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The volume–outcome relationship in congenital heart surgery (CHS) has been widely reported internationally, but systematic nationwide evidence from Korea remains limited. Given the concentration of high-volume centers in the Seoul Capital Area (SCA), we aimed to examine whether hospital surgical volume was associated with short-term mortality and to what extent regional disparities could be explained by differences in surgical volume. Materials and Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 31,150 patients who underwent CHS in 91 hospitals in Korea between 2002 and 2021 using National Health Insurance claims data. Hospitals were classified by location (SCA vs. non-SCA). Annual surgical volume was defined using two approaches, (i) above vs. below the overall mean annual volume (17.1 cases per hospital), and (ii) three categories (≤20,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCongenital Heart Disease Studies · Tracheal and airway disorders · Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
