# Microbial Succession on Honey Bee Body Surfaces Reflects Behavioral Maturation

**Authors:** Wenbo Wang, Chonghui Zhao, Yane Zhou, Chunling Yi, Mengfan Zhou, Yi Zhang, Shaokang Huang, Wenfeng Li

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms14020513 · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

This study shows that the microbial communities on honey bee body surfaces change as the bees mature behaviorally, with distinct patterns observed across different life stages.

## Contribution

The study reveals a novel link between behavioral maturation and shifts in surface microbiota in both Eastern and Western honey bees.

## Key findings

- Forager bees had the highest microbial diversity, while nurse bees had the lowest.
- Microbial communities varied significantly across behavioral stages and between the two honey bee species.
- Foragers showed higher abundance of Gilliamella, while nurses had more Lactobacillus.

## Abstract

Behavioral maturation is essential for the proper functioning of honey bee societies and is regulated by multiple factors such as juvenile hormone (JH) and nutritional deficiency. Although recent studies have shown that surface-associated microbiota in insects can modulate host behavior, the relationship between body surface microbiota and behavioral maturation in honey bees remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to determine whether the surface microbial communities of honey bees shift with behavioral maturation. By using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, we analyzed the surface microbiota of worker bees at different behavioral stages (newly emerged bees, nurses, and foragers) in both Eastern honey bee Apis cerana and Western honey bee Apis mellifera. The results showed that in both honey bee species, nurse bees exhibited the lowest microbial diversity, while forager bees showed the highest, and newly emerged bees had an intermediate level of microbial diversity. Moreover, beta diversity analyses revealed that the body surface microbiota of worker bees significantly varied across behavioral stages in both bee species and differed between the two bee species at the same behavioral stage. Additionally, in both bee species, at the phylum level, Pseudomonadota, Bacillota, and Actinobacteriota dominated the worker bee body surface microbiota; at the genus level, foragers had more Gilliamella, while nurses harbored more Lactobacillus. Together, our findings reveal the emergence of distinct microbial signatures on honey bee body surfaces during behavioral maturation.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Apis cerana (taxon 7461), Apis mellifera (taxon 7460)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fungal (MESH:D009181), parasitic infestations (MESH:D007239), nutritional deficiency (MESH:D044342), Diseases (MESH:D004194), injury to (MESH:D014947)
- **Chemicals:** PBS (MESH:D007854), hydrocarbon (MESH:D006838), EO (MESH:C033180), CHCs (-), agar (MESH:D000362), lactic acid (MESH:D019344), nitrogen (MESH:D009584), nitrate (MESH:D009566), sugars (MESH:D000073893)
- **Species:** Grapholita molesta (oriental fruit moth, species) [taxon 192188], Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly, species) [taxon 7227], Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (species) [taxon 1590], Apis mellifera (bee, species) [taxon 7460], Bacillus (genus) [taxon 55087], Beauveria bassiana (species) [taxon 176275], Pseudomonas (RNA similarity group I, genus) [taxon 286], Shigella (genus) [taxon 620], Mycobacterium (genus) [taxon 1763], Osmia bicornis (red mason bee, species) [taxon 1437190], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Burkholderia (genus) [taxon 32008], Bifidobacterium (genus) [taxon 1678], Rhodococcus (genus) [taxon 1661425], Chroococcidiopsis thermalis PCC 7203 (strain) [taxon 251229], Ralstonia (genus) [taxon 48736], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Methylobacterium (genus) [taxon 407], Apis cerana (Asiatic honeybee, species) [taxon 7461], Brevundimonas (genus) [taxon 41275], Arthrobacter (genus) [taxon 1663], Streptococcus (genus) [taxon 1301], Bacteroidota (Bacteroides-Cytophaga-Flexibacter group, phylum) [taxon 976], Paraburkholderia (genus) [taxon 1822464], Actinomycetota (actinobacteria, phylum) [taxon 201174], Enterococcus (genus) [taxon 1350], Enterobacter (genus) [taxon 547], Massilia (genus) [taxon 149698], Klebsiella (genus) [taxon 570], Sphingomonas (genus) [taxon 13687], Snodgrassella (genus) [taxon 1193515], Gilliamella (genus) [taxon 1193503], Caulobacter (genus) [taxon 75], Paenibacillus (genus) [taxon 44249], Acinetobacter (genus) [taxon 469], Commensalibacter (genus) [taxon 1079922], Hydrogenophaga (genus) [taxon 47420], Caballeronia (genus) [taxon 1827195], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932], Lactobacillus (genus) [taxon 1578], Stenotrophomonas (genus) [taxon 40323], Apibacter (genus) [taxon 1778601], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Pseudarthrobacter (genus) [taxon 1742993], Lachnospiraceae (family) [taxon 186803], Faecalibacterium (genus) [taxon 216851]

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943567/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943567