# Junctional Failures Following Long-Level Fusion to L5 in Elderly Patients: Impact of Spinopelvic Alignment and L5–S1 Disc Degeneration

**Authors:** In-Seok Son, Yong-Chan Kim, Sung-Min Kim, Xiongjie Li, Maolin Jin, Young-Jik Lee, Seung-Hyun Sim, Kee-Yong Ha

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/medicina62020411 · Medicina · 2026-02-21

## TL;DR

This study examines why spinal fusions ending at L5 in elderly patients often lead to junctional failures, finding that spinal alignment is more important than disc degeneration.

## Contribution

The study clarifies the relative impact of spinopelvic alignment versus L5–S1 disc degeneration on junctional failure patterns after long spinal fusion.

## Key findings

- Lower L5–S1 disc degeneration is more associated with proximal junctional failure (PJF), while higher degeneration is linked to distal junctional failure (DJF).
- Preoperative thoracolumbar kyphosis and T1 pelvic angle are significant risk factors for PJF.
- Postoperative proximal junctional angle and lumbar lordosis are independently associated with DJF.

## Abstract

Background and Objectives: Long spinal fusion terminating at L5 remains controversial because of the risk of postoperative junctional failure. Although degeneration of the residual L5–S1 disc has been suggested as a contributing factor, the relative impact of disc degeneration versus sagittal spinopelvic alignment on different junctional failure patterns has not been fully clarified. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 47 patients aged ≥60 years who underwent ≥5-level thoracolumbar fusion ending at L5 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Junctional failures were classified as proximal junctional failure (PJF) or distal junctional failure (DJF). Preoperative L5–S1 disc degeneration was assessed using modified Weiner and Pfirrmann classifications. Spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Junctional failure–free survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and risk factors were explored using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Junctional failures occurred in 28 patients (59.6%), including 16 PJFs (34.0%) and 10 DJFs (21.3%). Lower grades of L5–S1 disc degeneration (Weiner grades 0–1) were more frequently associated with PJFs, whereas higher grades (≥2) were predominantly associated with DJFs (p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative thoracolumbar kyphosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.164), preoperative T1 pelvic angle (HR = 1.269), and postoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch (HR = 0.877) as significant risk factors for PJF. Postoperative proximal junctional angle (HR = 0.899) and lumbar lordosis (HR = 0.920) were independently associated with DJF. Conclusions: Sagittal spinopelvic alignment parameters appear to have a greater influence on junctional failure patterns than residual L5–S1 disc degeneration in long fusions terminating at L5. Adequate sagittal correction should be prioritized to reduce the risk of both proximal and distal junctional failures.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** LIV fracture (MESH:D050723), degenerative sagittal imbalance (MESH:D019636), injury to (MESH:D014947), blood loss (MESH:D016063), lumbar fusion (MESH:C563613), ASD (MESH:D009134), spinal stenosis (MESH:D013130), DJF (MESH:D051437), pseudarthrosis (MESH:D011542), TLK (MESH:D007738), rod fracture (MESH:D017696), sagittal imbalance (MESH:D003398), fracture of the L5 vertebra (MESH:C562952), neurological deficits (MESH:D009461), spinal deformity (MESH:D013122), junctional (MESH:D020511), degenerative lumbar scoliosis (MESH:D012600), junctional collapse (MESH:D001261), neuromuscular, congenital, infectious, traumatic, or neoplastic spinal disorders (MESH:D000094025), lordosis (MESH:D008141), -S1 disc degeneration (MESH:D055959), degeneration (MESH:D009410), Long spinal fusion (MESH:D000094024), junctional subluxation (MESH:D004204)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943315/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943315/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943315/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12943315