# Extraction Matrix Shapes the Efficacy of Gegen Qinlian Decoction in DSS-Induced Colitis: A Preclinical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

## TL;DR

This study finds that the extraction method of a traditional Chinese medicine, Gegen Qinlian Decoction, affects its effectiveness in treating colitis in mice.

## Contribution

The study systematically compares the efficacy of aqueous versus ethanolic extractions of GQD in preclinical colitis models.

## Key findings

- Aqueous GQD showed consistent improvement in disease activity and colon length with low heterogeneity.
- Ethanolic GQD had variable results despite a larger effect on histology.
- Aqueous GQD reduced inflammation and improved gut microbiota diversity.

## Abstract

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease marked by mucosal injury and immune dysregulation. Gegen Qinlian Decoction (GQD) shows therapeutic potential, but extraction-dependent reproducibility remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies evaluating GQD aqueous decoctions or ethanolic extracts in DSS-induced colitis. Main outcome: Disease Activity Index (DAI). Key additional outcomes: colon length and histological injury; cytokines and microbiota were also assessed. Random-effects models with Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman adjustment, subgroup analyses, and exploratory dose–response meta-regression were applied. Results: Eight studies were included (aqueous: 5; ethanolic: 3; 209 mice). GQD significantly improved DAI (SMD −2.17; p < 0.00001; I2 = 43%), colon length (MD 1.18 cm; p < 0.00001; I2 = 88%), and histological injury (SMD −3.02; p < 0.0001; I2 = 51%). For DAI, both preparations favored GQD, with absent heterogeneity in aqueous studies (I2 = 0%) vs. substantial variability in ethanolic extracts (I2 = 75%). For histology, subgroup differences suggested a larger effect size with ethanolic extracts, with higher heterogeneity (I2 = 60% vs. 0%). In the aqueous subset, GQD reduced inflammatory markers and increased microbial diversity. Dose–response meta-regression was performed within the aqueous subset as an exploratory analysis. Conclusions: Aqueous decoctions showed the most reproducible profile across key endpoints, whereas ethanolic extracts were more variable despite a larger histology point estimate, indicating that the extraction matrix meaningfully influences translational consistency in preclinical research.