# Non-Thermal and Mild Thermal Technologies for Table Egg Shell Surface Decontamination: Microbial Efficacy, Egg Quality, and Industrial Considerations

**Authors:** Izadora Martina de Freitas Meireles, Wilson José Fernandes Lemos Junior, Amanda Mattos Dias-Martins, Marco Antônio Pereira da Silva, Claudio Cipolat-Gotet, Leandro Pereira Cappato

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms14020442 · Microorganisms · 2026-02-12

## TL;DR

This paper reviews non-thermal and mild thermal methods to decontaminate egg shells, focusing on their effectiveness, impact on egg quality, and industrial feasibility.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive review of non-thermal and mild thermal decontamination technologies for table eggs, highlighting their microbial efficacy and industrial constraints.

## Key findings

- Non-thermal technologies like UV-C and ozone can reduce microbial loads on eggshells without significant damage to egg quality.
- Industrial factors such as treatment uniformity and line speed affect the real-world performance of these decontamination methods.
- These technologies cannot inactivate pathogens that have penetrated shell membranes, emphasizing the need for targeted application.

## Abstract

Microbial contamination of table eggs remains an important food safety concern, largely due to the presence of Salmonella spp. on eggshell surfaces and the potential for cross-contamination along the collection, grading, and packing chain. Conventional sanitation practices, including chlorinated-water washing, can reduce surface microbial loads but may also present limitations related to cuticle alteration, process variability, water use, and the risk of recontamination when operational conditions are not tightly controlled. This review synthesizes evidence on non-thermal and selected mild thermal technologies for the surface decontamination of intact table eggs, including ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation, pulsed light, ozone-based treatments (gas and microbubble systems), non-thermal plasma, plasma-activated water, and gas-phase hydroxyl radical processes. For each approach, antimicrobial performance is discussed alongside effects on eggshell integrity, cuticle preservation, and key quality indicators (e.g., Haugh unit, albumen pH, yolk color, and shell strength). Particular attention is given to industrial constraints that influence real-world performance, such as treatment uniformity and shading effects, humidity dependence, line speed, equipment integration, and validation criteria. A shared limitation of surface treatments is their inability to inactivate pathogens that have penetrated shell membranes or contaminated egg contents, underscoring the need to align technology selection with the targeted hazard and the regulatory context. Thus, available data indicate that non-thermal technologies can contribute to reducing eggshell contamination when properly optimized, although broader implementation will depend on standardized operating parameters, robust process validation, and regulatory acceptance within existing egg processing systems.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** ozone (PubChem CID 24823)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cardiovascular disease (MESH:D002318), toxicity (MESH:D064420), injury to (MESH:D014947), stroke (MESH:D020521)
- **Chemicals:** H2O2 (MESH:D006861), OMB (-), superoxide (MESH:D013481), O3 (MESH:D010126), helium (MESH:D006371), CP (MESH:D058626), hydrogen ions (MESH:D011522), disulfide (MESH:D004220), sulfhydryl (MESH:D013438), nitrite (MESH:D009573), RNS (MESH:D026361), chlorine (MESH:D002713), lipid (MESH:D008055), lipopolysaccharides (MESH:D008070), OH (MESH:C031356), halogen (MESH:D006219), lysine (MESH:D008239), H+ (MESH:D006859), ROS (MESH:D017382), calcium carbonate (MESH:D002119), nitrate (MESH:D009566), oxygen (MESH:D010100), NO2- (MESH:D009585), nitrogen (MESH:D009584), thymine (MESH:D013941), C (MESH:D002244), QA (MESH:D000644), Water (MESH:D014867), carotenoids (MESH:D002338), NO3- (MESH:C038619), cholesterol (MESH:D002784), Nitric oxide (MESH:D009569), Hydroxyl (MESH:D017665)
- **Species:** Listeria monocytogenes (species) [taxon 1639], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Escherichia coli K-12 (strain) [taxon 83333], Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (strain) [taxon 1322345], Micrococcus (genus) [taxon 1269], Bacillota (clostridial firmicutes, phylum) [taxon 1239], Shigella (genus) [taxon 620], Enterobacteriaceae (enterobacteria, family) [taxon 543], Pseudomonas (RNA similarity group I, genus) [taxon 286], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031], Enterococcus faecium (species) [taxon 1352], Bacillus (genus) [taxon 55087], Proteus (genus) [taxon 210425], Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Klebsiella michiganensis (species) [taxon 1134687], Aerococcus (genus) [taxon 1375], Acinetobacter (genus) [taxon 469], Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (no rank) [taxon 149539], Lactobacillus (genus) [taxon 1578], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932], Psychrobacter (genus) [taxon 497], Salmonella enterica (species) [taxon 28901], Enterococcus faecalis (species) [taxon 1351], Pseudomonadota (proteobacteria, phylum) [taxon 1224], Campylobacter jejuni (species) [taxon 197], Serratia (genus) [taxon 613], Aeromonas (genus) [taxon 642], Citrobacter (genus) [taxon 544], Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (no rank) [taxon 90371]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942837/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942837/full.md

## References

71 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942837/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12942837