# Separation of Organic Carbon and Nutrients from Liquid Waste by Using Membrane Technologies

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how membrane technologies can separate organic carbon and nutrients from liquid waste, offering insights into improving wastewater treatment for environmental and resource recovery goals.

## Contribution

The study introduces a unified analytical framework to better understand and enhance the separation capabilities of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes.

## Key findings

- Microfiltration primarily separates particulate organic carbon and suspended solids.
- Ultrafiltration extends separation to macromolecular organic carbon and phosphorus through indirect retention.
- Dissolved nitrogen species mostly pass through membranes unless chemically transformed.

## Abstract

Rising concentrations of organic carbon (OC), phosphorus, and nitrogen in liquid waste from urban, industrial, and agricultural sources pose persistent challenges for environmental protection and resource recovery. Despite extensive application of microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) in wastewater treatment, their role in selective organic carbon and nutrient fractionation remains insufficiently clear-cut and is often interpreted solely through nominal pore size. This review was guided by the hypothesis that the reported limitations of MF and UF for nutrient separation are not intrinsic to the technologies but arise from simplified interpretations of separation mechanisms. A unified analytical framework was developed by synthesizing recent studies, linking membrane surface charge, pore structure, solute speciation, fouling-induced secondary layers, and operating conditions to the observed separation behavior. The analysis shows that MF fractionates particulate OC and suspended solids, whereas UF extends separation to macromolecular OC and phosphorus mainly via indirect retention mechanisms. Dissolved nitrogen species largely permeate both membranes unless they are transformed into retainable forms. Performance differences between MF and UF are conditional and system-dependent, with enhanced selectivity emerging through process integration. MF and UF can thus be repositioned as strategic fractionation interfaces within integrated treatment systems supporting circular economy–oriented wastewater management.